Working on Data Migrator with the column references (E01, E02, etc.) is a complete pain in the arse. Does anyone know a way to have it use the actual field names so the source can be printed and reviewed in an understandable way?
Couple of assumptions I'm making: (a) you are either looking directly into the .FEX with something like NotePad or at the text view of the flow via the GUI and (b) that the .FEX has an associated .ETG that goes along with it. I know what you mean about the E01, E02 that you see in a text view but when you look at the target transforms via the GUI, you see actual field names. I don't know of any way you can make the text view show the real names but open a case with IBI and see what they say. I suspect that it was done that way intentially for cases where the source and the target have the same field name and they needed to differentiate between the two. Sorry I'm not more help.
Data Migrator 5.3 and 7.1 SQL Server, Oracle, DB2 Windows
If you "pay no attention to the man behind the curtain" or don't look at the focexec that DM generates then you should never see the Enn columns. They are used internally to distinguish the incoming values from target table. However DataMigrator does have a way to review and print the flow in an understandable way. Right click on the data flow name and select View Flow report and you'll see the transformations clearly.
Unless there's something wrong (and sometimes not) with the transform at which point you'll get nothing but an error code. This is a problem that very much needs to be fixed for workers to be productive with this tool. Not having access to a readable version of the source code is becoming a real hassle on my current project. Dozens of hours burned.
Update -- apparently the length of the application folder name is part of the problem. Don't use long names for application folders!!!
Also take care using this, as I am finding places where the source transformations do not appear in the report, and long transforms are cropped in both source and destination.
This message has been edited. Last edited by: John_Edwards,