Focal Point Banner


As of December 1, 2020, Focal Point is retired and repurposed as a reference repository. We value the wealth of knowledge that's been shared here over the years. You'll continue to have access to this treasure trove of knowledge, for search purposes only.

Join the TIBCO Community
TIBCO Community is a collaborative space for users to share knowledge and support one another in making the best use of TIBCO products and services. There are several TIBCO WebFOCUS resources in the community.

  • From the Home page, select Predict: WebFOCUS to view articles, questions, and trending articles.
  • Select Products from the top navigation bar, scroll, and then select the TIBCO WebFOCUS product page to view product overview, articles, and discussions.
  • Request access to the private WebFOCUS User Group (login required) to network with fellow members.

Former myibi community members should have received an email on 8/3/22 to activate their user accounts to join the community. Check your Spam folder for the email. Please get in touch with us at community@tibco.com for further assistance. Reference the community FAQ to learn more about the community.


Focal Point    Focal Point Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Performance Management Framework (PMF)    RFC - possible change to Dimension Loader form

Read-Only Read-Only Topic
Go
Search
Notify
Tools
RFC - possible change to Dimension Loader form
 Login/Join
 
Platinum Member
posted
Hi Everyone!

Happy Monday Morning! Roll Eyes

As you know, we here at the PMF development team are always on the lookout for ways to improve the end user experience. Recently we were reviewing the Dimension Loader form and we have a change in mind, but before doing this we would like your feedback. So if you folks out there could take a few minutes and give us your opinion, it would be a big help.

If you look at the Dimension Loader form, in the upper left hand corner there is a drop down box labeled "Table Type" - and there are three options:

"Separate Table"
"From measures"
"Custom coding"

We would like to remove this option box entirely from the form, since it is our belief and understanding that everyone should be using the "Separate table" option and avoid using the other two options.

So what are these other two options? Taking these in reverse order, the 'Custom coding' option is very obscure, highly technical, and it is not even documented. To the best of our knowledge no one is using this. Next, the 'From Measures' option means that ALL of your source data for both Dimensions AND Measures must be in one and only one Master File. This option is very limiting and we discourage everyone from doing this. Instead, we recommend that you split up your Dimensions and Measures data into separate source files and let WebFOCUS issue the joins - that's the 'Separate table' option

The obvious next question is why do we even have these other two options? The reason was to support some very early demo versions of the product. This goes back to PMF release 2.1 in 2005.

So our question to everyone is simply - "Is it OK if we eliminate this drop down box?" Is anyone out there using the 'From Measures' option and if so could you tell us why and how hard would it be for you to switch over to 'Separate tables'.

Thanks in advance for your help!

EricH
 
Posts: 164 | Registered: March 26, 2003Report This Post
Gold member
posted Hide Post
Eric,

I am in complete agreement with requiring a separate table as the only way to load a dimension. If you move forward with this, will it also facilitate that when a measure is loaded it would use the PMF dimension table rather than the source table? Also, has there been any thought to allowing selection when loading a dimension?


WF 8.09
 
Posts: 68 | Location: United States | Registered: March 28, 2007Report This Post
Platinum Member
posted Hide Post
Hey Janice,

Thanks for your input. Regarding your two questions:

As far as the Measure Loader goes, our philosophy has always been that the source data rules; if there are discrepancies between PMF dimension data and source dimension data, then the source is correct. So there are no current plans to join to PMF dimension tables during the Measure Loader.

Regarding filtering/selection during the Dimension Load, we have no current plans to do this as there has not been enough of a demand. If you need selection on the Dimension Loade, you can do is put in a WebFOCUS filter in the "Prefix Code" section.

Eric
 
Posts: 164 | Registered: March 26, 2003Report This Post
Master
posted Hide Post
OK, since the consensus from offline and online conversations seems to be nobody is using "From Measures," the next GA version of PMF, 5.2, due out in August, will have this disabled.

If any of Dimensions are set for "From Measures" the option will be blanked, although the measure data won't be changed; but to load your measures again you'll need to specify the separate table they come from. This is the way every customer we've talked to uses PMF. The "From Measures" option was actually supposed to be used only for quick demos.

thanks all


Bob Jude Ferrante
Director of Business and Development
WebFOCUS Performance Management
Bob_Ferrante@ibi.com
917-339-5105

I'll take any questions about PMF - business or technical - anytime!

 
Posts: 919 | Registered: March 26, 2003Report This Post
  Powered by Social Strata  

Read-Only Read-Only Topic

Focal Point    Focal Point Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Performance Management Framework (PMF)    RFC - possible change to Dimension Loader form

Copyright © 1996-2020 Information Builders