Focal Point Banner


As of December 1, 2020, Focal Point is retired and repurposed as a reference repository. We value the wealth of knowledge that's been shared here over the years. You'll continue to have access to this treasure trove of knowledge, for search purposes only.

Join the TIBCO Community
TIBCO Community is a collaborative space for users to share knowledge and support one another in making the best use of TIBCO products and services. There are several TIBCO WebFOCUS resources in the community.

  • From the Home page, select Predict: WebFOCUS to view articles, questions, and trending articles.
  • Select Products from the top navigation bar, scroll, and then select the TIBCO WebFOCUS product page to view product overview, articles, and discussions.
  • Request access to the private WebFOCUS User Group (login required) to network with fellow members.

Former myibi community members should have received an email on 8/3/22 to activate their user accounts to join the community. Check your Spam folder for the email. Please get in touch with us at community@tibco.com for further assistance. Reference the community FAQ to learn more about the community.



Read-Only Read-Only Topic
Go
Search
Notify
Tools
[CLOSED] FOC36207??
 Login/Join
 
<kiddpete>
posted
A colleague is getting a (FOC36207) DECIMAL OVERFLOW--FIELD SET TO MAXIMUM

My manual is not showing this message. Can someone tell me what it means? We are running Focus 7.1.1 under ZOS/TSO on an IBM mainframe Eeker

This message has been edited. Last edited by: Kerry,
 
Report This Post
Silver Member
posted Hide Post
this is what I get when I query the error number -

During an aggregation (SUM), the result of an ADD DECIMAL instruction exceeded the capacity of the field. The magnitude of the field has been set to 99...99 (the sign is unchanged) and the corresponding count has been frozen.

Seems like your field is too small to hold the result.
 
Posts: 37 | Registered: April 14, 2003Report This Post
<kiddpete>
posted
Big Grin I guess I could have done that. Thanks for the info.
 
Report This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Hello Kiddpete,

Could you please let me know did you resolved this issue?


Raghuraman K
 
Posts: 26 | Registered: March 16, 2007Report This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Hello Kiddpete,

Could you please let me know how did you resolved this issue?


Raghuraman K
 
Posts: 26 | Registered: March 16, 2007Report This Post
Virtuoso
posted Hide Post
Nine Years later I don't know if Kiddpete is still around.

As Tred said in the post.
Seems like your field is too small to hold the result.

Increase the size of your result field.
 
Posts: 1903 | Location: San Antonio | Registered: February 28, 2005Report This Post
Master
posted Hide Post
quote:
Nine Years later I don't know if Kiddpete is still around.

I had the pleasure to work with Kidd Pete many years in Chicago. Kidd Pete has indeed 'hung up his spurs', and is enjoying retirement.

His post was a long time ago, I *think* it might have been that at the time, large packed fields were not quite supported yet, or at least in all scenarios.
 
Posts: 822 | Registered: April 23, 2003Report This Post
  Powered by Social Strata  

Read-Only Read-Only Topic


Copyright © 1996-2020 Information Builders