Focal Point Banner


As of December 1, 2020, Focal Point is retired and repurposed as a reference repository. We value the wealth of knowledge that's been shared here over the years. You'll continue to have access to this treasure trove of knowledge, for search purposes only.

Join the TIBCO Community
TIBCO Community is a collaborative space for users to share knowledge and support one another in making the best use of TIBCO products and services. There are several TIBCO WebFOCUS resources in the community.

  • From the Home page, select Predict: WebFOCUS to view articles, questions, and trending articles.
  • Select Products from the top navigation bar, scroll, and then select the TIBCO WebFOCUS product page to view product overview, articles, and discussions.
  • Request access to the private WebFOCUS User Group (login required) to network with fellow members.

Former myibi community members should have received an email on 8/3/22 to activate their user accounts to join the community. Check your Spam folder for the email. Please get in touch with us at community@tibco.com for further assistance. Reference the community FAQ to learn more about the community.


Focal Point    Focal Point Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  WebFOCUS/FOCUS Forum on Focal Point     [CLOSED] Compressed Oracle Data

Read-Only Read-Only Topic
Go
Search
Notify
Tools
[CLOSED] Compressed Oracle Data
 Login/Join
 
Guru
posted
Has anybody encountered any issues with compressed Oracle data

(1.) codding changes
(2.) performance
(3.) anything else

Thanks as always,
the Focus Nation rocks!

This message has been edited. Last edited by: S.J. Kadish,


Sandy Kadish
Dev: 8.2.04- PostgreSQL
Test: 8.2.04 - PostgreSQL
Prod: 8.2.04 - PostgreSQL
 
Posts: 238 | Location: Atlanta, GA/Rehovot, Israel | Registered: May 06, 2003Report This Post
Virtuoso
posted Hide Post
I haven't used compression in Oracle so can't comment on actual performance.

No coding changes should be required at all since the compression is handled directly and internally by Oracle at the time of writing to the data block, and decompression upon reading from it, and this all happens transparently to the application.

Performance may get both affected and improved by using compression even if that sounds contradictory.

CPU utilization gets higher because of the extra "effort" required to compress/decompress data so performance may suffer some degradation.

At the same time, compression allows more rows to fit into data blocks which means the database cache is optimized by having more rows available in it without requiring additional memory allocation. More rows cached may translate into more consistent gets and less physical reads, and since I/O is usually one of the most expensive operations in the database, reducing physical reads may contribute to performance gains.

As with any new feature, there are hardly any "rules of thumb" applicable to all scenarios. Your experience may be very different from others just because of data volumes, how much your data changes throughout the day or if it's mostly read-only, etc. Only thorough testing will tell.

Please let us know of your observations as this is definitely an interesting feature to be explored.



Prod/Dev: WF Server 8008/Win 2008 - WF Client 8008/Win 2008 - Dev. Studio: 8008/Windows 7 - DBMS: Oracle 11g Rel 2
Test: Dev. Studio 8008 /Windows 7 (Local) Output:HTML, EXL2K.
 
Posts: 1533 | Registered: August 12, 2005Report This Post
Guru
posted Hide Post
We really appreciate your notes, especially about CPU utilization. Server hits are a concern so we should know about impact in advance.


Sandy Kadish
Dev: 8.2.04- PostgreSQL
Test: 8.2.04 - PostgreSQL
Prod: 8.2.04 - PostgreSQL
 
Posts: 238 | Location: Atlanta, GA/Rehovot, Israel | Registered: May 06, 2003Report This Post
  Powered by Social Strata  

Read-Only Read-Only Topic

Focal Point    Focal Point Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  WebFOCUS/FOCUS Forum on Focal Point     [CLOSED] Compressed Oracle Data

Copyright © 1996-2020 Information Builders