Focal Point Banner

As of December 1, 2020, Focal Point is retired and repurposed as a reference repository. We value the wealth of knowledge that's been shared here over the years. You'll continue to have access to this treasure trove of knowledge, for search purposes only. Moving forward, myibi is our community platform to learn, share, and collaborate. We have the same Focal Point forum categories in myibi, so you can continue to have all new conversations there. If you need access to myibi, contact us at and provide your corporate email address, company, and name.

Connect to myibi
Focal Point    Focal Point Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  WebFOCUS/FOCUS Forum on Focal Point     URGENT ! I need arguments against HTML-DB

Read-Only Read-Only Topic
URGENT ! I need arguments against HTML-DB
Hey Guys,
what's up ?

I have to fight against HTML-DB as a development tool in comparison to WFS.
Can anyone help me out with arguments ?

I'm a WFS user since 20years, but now I'm in a position, were my new Company is "adicted" to Oracle tools.
I highly appriciate any help.

Thx Achim
Report This Post
posted Hide Post
An interesting article was posted a while back comparing different BI tools:
Previous post

This message has been edited. Last edited by: Kerry,
Posts: 391 | Location: California | Registered: April 14, 2003Report This Post
<Joseph Coule>

Oracle makes a great database, but a great database-maker does not necessarily make a great BI-maker. That Forrester study that Nicola refered to evaluated Oracle and Information Builders, as well several other BI vendors and Oracle did not fare that well but Information Builders was in the leader quadrant of just about every category. It could definitely come in handy in making a case for Information Builders over Oracle for enterprise BI development and deployment.

Here's the URL from the earlier thread:

I read another new study on the IBI site from Meta Group that ranked the different BI vendors for enterprise reporting and dashboard functionality. IBI won that one hands-down (probably why they bought the reprint rights to it, huh?). That one is here:

Oracle was also included in that study. IBI's overall score was 5.6. Oracle trailed the pack in that one with a 3.7 overall score.

Check them both out becuz together they make a very strong case for Webfocus over Oracle's BI tools.

Seems like IBI is finally getting the props they deserve!

Report This Post
posted Hide Post
Several things here also. I think you should have enough to read now.
Posts: 1903 | Location: San Antonio | Registered: February 28, 2005Report This Post
Silver Member
posted Hide Post
Well I certainly can't give you 10 reasons, but if several of us each gave you 1 or 2, it would add up.

How about database "lock-in". I don't know anything about the Oracle tool, but I could imagine that it is very strongly tied to their database. So an argument could possibly be made that with WebFOCUS you are not tied to any particular data source. You can pull data from multiple sources/databases/database engines, and transparently join all these disparate resources together. I can't imagine any medium to large corporation relying solely on a single database vendor, and WebFOCUS provides database transparency, whether it be Oracle, Informix, DB2, Teradata, Sybase, etc., etc.

Good Luck
Posts: 40 | Registered: March 10, 2004Report This Post
Hey Guys,

thanks for your help !!!
I was sure, that I can count on IB and their user community !

Best regards
Report This Post
  Powered by Social Strata  

Read-Only Read-Only Topic

Focal Point    Focal Point Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  WebFOCUS/FOCUS Forum on Focal Point     URGENT ! I need arguments against HTML-DB

Copyright © 1996-2020 Information Builders