Focal Point Banner


As of December 1, 2020, Focal Point is retired and repurposed as a reference repository. We value the wealth of knowledge that's been shared here over the years. You'll continue to have access to this treasure trove of knowledge, for search purposes only.

Join the TIBCO Community
TIBCO Community is a collaborative space for users to share knowledge and support one another in making the best use of TIBCO products and services. There are several TIBCO WebFOCUS resources in the community.

  • From the Home page, select Predict: WebFOCUS to view articles, questions, and trending articles.
  • Select Products from the top navigation bar, scroll, and then select the TIBCO WebFOCUS product page to view product overview, articles, and discussions.
  • Request access to the private WebFOCUS User Group (login required) to network with fellow members.

Former myibi community members should have received an email on 8/3/22 to activate their user accounts to join the community. Check your Spam folder for the email. Please get in touch with us at community@tibco.com for further assistance. Reference the community FAQ to learn more about the community.


Focal Point    Focal Point Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  WebFOCUS/FOCUS Forum on Focal Point     [CLOSED] Trying to move to portals - but is it worth it?

Read-Only Read-Only Topic
Go
Search
Notify
Tools
[CLOSED] Trying to move to portals - but is it worth it?
 Login/Join
 
Member
posted
My first concern is that my Admin is worried about the overhead Portals create. I would like to know what other Admins have to say about this, is it an administration nightmare? Is it a performance nightmare?

My second concern is that we have one environment. We are only allowed the portals which have been deemed necessary by the Admin. So, Save As or Creating Portals is not allowed, any changes we make will be live and if a goof happens then our users will find out what Live Dev means. What are your thoughts, ideas for approach?


I am working on a portal and my approach has been to -INCLUDE the reporting fex that resides in the EDA environment. Our EDA environment has two nodes, one that is secure and one that is not.
When I include a fex that uses .mas files against our Mainframe/DataWarehouse tables I am getting the error that no password has been provided.
I am being told that I am engineering this wrong and that everything that I do has to exist under the CONTENT folder. I am hesitant to do this as the reports in question are also being scheduled within report caster and I just really hate the idea of maintaining two sets of code or having to move everything to the content folder and then find all the schedules for each fex I move and re-do them. It all seems as if no matter what I do is going to be 10x more work than what I first imagined.

My question then is...if you are moving your users to the Portal environment, what was your approach. Pitfalls/Blessings/Reasons for a Mental Health Day

Many thanks ahead of time and I hope this made some sense.

This message has been edited. Last edited by: FP Mod Chuck,


~J
Prod: 8.2.03 | OS: AIX | Outputs: you name it...you got it
Dev: We don't need no stinkin dev box!
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
I may not understand a darn thing you say, but I will defend to the death your right to confuse me.
 
Posts: 6 | Location: Texas | Registered: November 01, 2006Report This Post
Virtuoso
posted Hide Post
In my world, the Admin doesn't dictate how I architect an application. S/he supports the one I choose. The idea that you're not allowed to have a Dev, Test, Prod environments makes no sense. If that's dictated by your Admin, you should try to explain the dangers to his/her boss.

The repository has very little overhead. It is safer than leaving things on disk. It is the recommended way to use WebFOCUS and like it or not it's the direction IB is going. Resistance is futile. Take the plunge and you'll see all the benefits of using the Domains and you'll have happier users.


WebFOCUS 8206, Unix, Windows
 
Posts: 1853 | Location: New York City | Registered: December 30, 2015Report This Post
Virtuoso
posted Hide Post
Hi Seibel

I love what you have written in your profile and signature, what a great attitude..

Unfortunately there is no silver bullet for moving from 7.7.03 where you have all of your code on the reporting server. I have seen other customers use URL's defined in the content area with WFServlet calls to run procedures (fex's) from the app folders and URL's with /approot references to run html forms stored there as well. That works great for environments where the web tier and reporting server are on a single machine. It is definitely a chore to move the code from the reporting server to the content area and I agree you don't want to just duplicate it and maintain it in two places. I do agree with Babak that the future of WF Development is to create anything new in the content area. Once you have implemented a strategy for using the content area the portal is an excellent deployment area first of all due the the enhanced security to isolate applications. Performance of the portal is as good as the performance of your application meaning that long running reports will still be long running but not worse.

I hope this helps you!


Thank you for using Focal Point!

Chuck Wolff - Focal Point Moderator
WebFOCUS 7x and 8x, Windows, Linux All output Formats
 
Posts: 2127 | Location: Customer Support | Registered: April 12, 2005Report This Post
  Powered by Social Strata  

Read-Only Read-Only Topic

Focal Point    Focal Point Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  WebFOCUS/FOCUS Forum on Focal Point     [CLOSED] Trying to move to portals - but is it worth it?

Copyright © 1996-2020 Information Builders