As of December 1, 2020, Focal Point is retired and repurposed as a reference repository. We value the wealth of knowledge that's been shared here over the years. You'll continue to have access to this treasure trove of knowledge, for search purposes only.
Join the TIBCO Community TIBCO Community is a collaborative space for users to share knowledge and support one another in making the best use of TIBCO products and services. There are several TIBCO WebFOCUS resources in the community.
From the Home page, select Predict: WebFOCUS to view articles, questions, and trending articles.
Select Products from the top navigation bar, scroll, and then select the TIBCO WebFOCUS product page to view product overview, articles, and discussions.
Request access to the private WebFOCUS User Group (login required) to network with fellow members.
Former myibi community members should have received an email on 8/3/22 to activate their user accounts to join the community. Check your Spam folder for the email. Please get in touch with us at community@tibco.com for further assistance. Reference the community FAQ to learn more about the community.
Dear all, I have one TABLE like this: index_key year week product_code customer_code order_qty 100 2010 45 AA001 B0004854 20 101 2010 45 AA001 B0004855 40
the filed index_key is primary key ,which automatic add 1 by 1 using sequence. the fileds is unique index.
now ,I got one line data like this: index_key year week product_code customer_code order_qty 110 2010 45 AA001 B0004854 50
the question is : when i update the data using to match . the value of order_qty has been updated for 50.but the index_key is also 100. why this happend?
much thanks?
webfocus 7.65 windows xp sp3 excel,html ,pdf,and graph
If INDEX_KEY is indeed the key and you were just doing normal Insert/Update processing then 110 isn't found and a new row would be inserted with that as the key. If you want the key values from the source to be used in the target then that's what you should do.
Does "using sequence" imply that the target is ORACLE and does that mean there is a trigger on INSERT to the target table so that INDEX_KEY is assinged the next value from the sequence?
In this case if you were matching on INDEX_KEY then 110 would not be found, and a new row would be inserted with the next value as a key, 103. But that's nto what happens.
Or are you matching on the *other* columns? YEAR, WEEK, PRODUCT_CODE, CUSTOMER_CODE? That's what it looks like, and there since you've got a match on those four fields so ORDER_QTY gets updated.
This could have been accomplished in DM by either editing the automarically generated synonym so that instead of having INDEX_KEY as the 1 key, the four other columns appear first and the table is identified as having 4 keys.
Or SCD (Slowly Changing Dimension) procesing could be used (in 7.7 with support for SEQUENCE) to to this.
Please advise what columns comprise the logical key of your target table.
N/A
Posts: 397 | Location: New York City | Registered: May 03, 2007
hi,Cilf, thanks for replying.yes,I am using Oracle. and the key is index_key,but i dont want to update the data with the filed index_key,i'd like to using the other four fileds to update. I have worked it out,the order_qty is changed to 50,but the index_key isnot changed,i want to know why? the main code about normal Insert/Update coding is like this.
CASE MATCHIT1 COMPUTE INDEX_KEY=E01; YEAR/P5 MISSING ON=E02; WEEK/P3 MISSING ON=E03; PRODUCT_CODE/A10V MISSING ON=E04; CUSTOMER_CODE/A20V MISSING ON=E05; ORDER_QTY/D20 MISSING ON = E06; -* MATCH INDEX_KEY --the default code,using index_key to match. MATCH YEAR --I have changed to use these four fields. MATCH WEEK MATCH PRODUCT_CODE MATCH CUSTOMER_CODE ON MATCH UPDATE * SEG TABLE_TEST ON NOMATCH INCLUDE GOTO TOP ENDCASE
webfocus 7.65 windows xp sp3 excel,html ,pdf,and graph