As of December 1, 2020, Focal Point is retired and repurposed as a reference repository. We value the wealth of knowledge that's been shared here over the years. You'll continue to have access to this treasure trove of knowledge, for search purposes only.
Join the TIBCO Community TIBCO Community is a collaborative space for users to share knowledge and support one another in making the best use of TIBCO products and services. There are several TIBCO WebFOCUS resources in the community.
From the Home page, select Predict: WebFOCUS to view articles, questions, and trending articles.
Select Products from the top navigation bar, scroll, and then select the TIBCO WebFOCUS product page to view product overview, articles, and discussions.
Request access to the private WebFOCUS User Group (login required) to network with fellow members.
Former myibi community members should have received an email on 8/3/22 to activate their user accounts to join the community. Check your Spam folder for the email. Please get in touch with us at community@tibco.com for further assistance. Reference the community FAQ to learn more about the community.
The principals of FOCUS apply. The denominator can be done with code, like so:
A/D20.4=A + ADJUSTMENT_FACTOR;
B/D20.4 WITH ADJUSTMENT_FACTOR=B+1;
ACTUAL_NUMERATOR/D20.4 WITH ADJUSTMENT_FACTOR=A / B;
The question is why you're doing this average this way. If you wanted you could make the denominator FIXED to the number you determine is the mean average across all your measures, and PMF would apply that as a constant. That might be closer to what you want.This message has been edited. Last edited by: Bob Jude Ferrante,
Bob Jude Ferrante Director of Business and Development WebFOCUS Performance Management Bob_Ferrante@ibi.com 917-339-5105
I'll take any questions about PMF - business or technical - anytime!
The adjustment factor is unique for each department, business unit etc. It allows for a normalized comparison between departments. So by aggregating Sum (Charge) / Ave (Factor) we are able to compare apples to apples no matter which departments are included in the aggregation.
In thinking through this, the issue is not at load time. The issue occurs during aggregation.
Any assistance would be appreciated.
WF 7.65. Solaris. PMF 5.11 on Oracle 10g
Posts: 48 | Location: New York | Registered: March 25, 2009
We do keep the record count during aggregation so that we can support averaging display on alternate time summaries.
So you can store the adjustment_factor value in the denominator of the measure. During aggregation, perform an IF test in a_compute_rpt_vars.fex looking for the measures where the aggregation has to average only the denominator and branch to a routine where you divide the denominator's value (e.g., because you stored the adjustment_factor in the denominator) and divide it by the record_count member to get the mean (average). That will work just fine.
Bob Jude Ferrante Director of Business and Development WebFOCUS Performance Management Bob_Ferrante@ibi.com 917-339-5105
I'll take any questions about PMF - business or technical - anytime!