As of December 1, 2020, Focal Point is retired and repurposed as a reference repository. We value the wealth of knowledge that's been shared here over the years. You'll continue to have access to this treasure trove of knowledge, for search purposes only.
Join the TIBCO Community TIBCO Community is a collaborative space for users to share knowledge and support one another in making the best use of TIBCO products and services. There are several TIBCO WebFOCUS resources in the community.
From the Home page, select Predict: WebFOCUS to view articles, questions, and trending articles.
Select Products from the top navigation bar, scroll, and then select the TIBCO WebFOCUS product page to view product overview, articles, and discussions.
Request access to the private WebFOCUS User Group (login required) to network with fellow members.
Former myibi community members should have received an email on 8/3/22 to activate their user accounts to join the community. Check your Spam folder for the email. Please get in touch with us at community@tibco.com for further assistance. Reference the community FAQ to learn more about the community.
Any thoughts on expanding the number of dimensions beyond 16? I don't know that we're at a point (yet) where we need more than that, but it does concern me a little that as we start building scorecards we suddenly hit a wall and have to remove dimensions...
Production: 7.6.6 WF Server  <=>  7.6.6 WF Client  <=>  7.6.6 Dev Studio Testing: <none> Using MRE & BID.  Connected to MS SQL Server 2005 Output Types: HTML, Excel, PDF
We've had 16 Dimensions in PMF since release 3. Typically at customer sites we've seen 4-6 dimensions used. Very few have more than 6.
From this experience we always inferred that 16 would be a good number at which to hold, being that it's more than double even the most ambitious engagements we've seen.
Our focus has been on keeping PMF a very fast-performing solution. Increasing the taxonomy would always come at a cost. That's why we have kept to 16 Dimensions.
The message we've typically told customers when they ask this question - usually a theoretical question - is that if you're thinking of turning PMF into a more general purpose OLAP type solution, you might want to augment your solution with an OLAP *reporting* cube (e.g., Fusion, Essbase, MS).
Perhaps though you're using Dimensions in a way we haven't seen yet, so now we're interested. What do you foresee being the number, depth and nature of the list of Dimensions you'd need?
many thanks
Bob Jude Ferrante Director of Business and Development WebFOCUS Performance Management Bob_Ferrante@ibi.com 917-339-5105
I'll take any questions about PMF - business or technical - anytime!
Being very early in the implementation, I would say that right now it's a theoretical question for us too. But a quick brainstorming session yesterday produced a list of about 18 things -- however I'm sure that list will be consolidated, reduced, etc. in the coming weeks. Right now, I see about 4 or 5 dimensions that I'm pretty confident will have to be in our scorecards. I can see maybe 4 or 5 more that could also sneak in. So right now, my best estimate is around 10 total.
I'll know more in the coming weeks when we get our CFO organization together to determine what those dimensions are. In the mean time, I can definitely appreciate the desire to keep it low in order to preserve performance. For now, let's assume that 16 will be enough and if it looks like it will become a problem, I'll get back in touch and we can take the discussion of our specific dimensions offline.
Thanks!
Production: 7.6.6 WF Server  <=>  7.6.6 WF Client  <=>  7.6.6 Dev Studio Testing: <none> Using MRE & BID.  Connected to MS SQL Server 2005 Output Types: HTML, Excel, PDF