As of December 1, 2020, Focal Point is retired and repurposed as a reference repository. We value the wealth of knowledge that's been shared here over the years. You'll continue to have access to this treasure trove of knowledge, for search purposes only.
Join the TIBCO Community TIBCO Community is a collaborative space for users to share knowledge and support one another in making the best use of TIBCO products and services. There are several TIBCO WebFOCUS resources in the community.
From the Home page, select Predict: WebFOCUS to view articles, questions, and trending articles.
Select Products from the top navigation bar, scroll, and then select the TIBCO WebFOCUS product page to view product overview, articles, and discussions.
Request access to the private WebFOCUS User Group (login required) to network with fellow members.
Former myibi community members should have received an email on 8/3/22 to activate their user accounts to join the community. Check your Spam folder for the email. Please get in touch with us at community@tibco.com for further assistance. Reference the community FAQ to learn more about the community.
We have a situation where we have our main distribution server running on a remote NT box. When I start a separate distribution server on my local machine, we get the following errors when a scheduled job is run:
Task error:THE FOCEXEC PROCEDURE CANNOT BE FOUND: trigchk FOCEXEC *
Error sending brief notification to xxxx@xxxxxxxx.comCould not connect to SMTP host: xxxx.COM, port: 25;
When I do not have the distribution server running on my local machine, the scheduled jobs run fine.
I�m not sure why having the distribution server running on my local machine is affecting our main distribution server which is running on another machine. Any ideas?
Thanks, Ron
Posts: 38 | Location: Milwaukee | Registered: April 28, 2005
Ron, What version are you running. Also the Distribution Server can NOT be using the same Repository. That might be your issue. Please provide more details on how you are configured.
We are running version 5.2.3. It turns out that both distribution servers were using the same repository. I'm still not sure why one machine took precedence over the other.
Ron
Posts: 38 | Location: Milwaukee | Registered: April 28, 2005