As of December 1, 2020, Focal Point is retired and repurposed as a reference repository. We value the wealth of knowledge that's been shared here over the years. You'll continue to have access to this treasure trove of knowledge, for search purposes only.
Join the TIBCO Community TIBCO Community is a collaborative space for users to share knowledge and support one another in making the best use of TIBCO products and services. There are several TIBCO WebFOCUS resources in the community.
From the Home page, select Predict: WebFOCUS to view articles, questions, and trending articles.
Select Products from the top navigation bar, scroll, and then select the TIBCO WebFOCUS product page to view product overview, articles, and discussions.
Request access to the private WebFOCUS User Group (login required) to network with fellow members.
Former myibi community members should have received an email on 8/3/22 to activate their user accounts to join the community. Check your Spam folder for the email. Please get in touch with us at community@tibco.com for further assistance. Reference the community FAQ to learn more about the community.
I checked the "Creating Reports With WebFOCUS Language" Version 8.0.0 and Version 7 Release 7 documentation, and it specifies the following:
Syntax:
WHERE [NOT] fieldname IN FILE file
where:
fieldname
Is the name of the selection field. It can be any real or temporary field in the data source.
file
Is the name of the file.
This is the ddname assigned by a DYNAM or TSO ALLOCATE command for z/OS.
So it would appear that the documentation is up to date.
WebFOCUS 8.2.06 mostly Windows Server
Posts: 195 | Location: Johannesburg, South Africa | Registered: September 13, 2008
Had you come across this before? Seems like a strange order to me!
If you look at it from the standpoint of "negating an expression" it doesn't look that strange anymore. Using additional brackets makes this easier to understand:
WHERE NOT (ST IN ('CT','NY'))
quote:
It's just the webfocus language...how they do things
SQL operates quite similarly in this case although it allows for some more "flexibility" when it comes to syntax. The following construct is pretty much the same as the WebFOCUS counterpart:
select ... from ...
where not st in ('CT','NY')
And is also equivalent to this:
select ... from ...
where st not in ('CT','NY')
Some may actually argue that "not in" looks weird as it seems as if they placed 2 consecutive operators instead of 1.