As of December 1, 2020, Focal Point is retired and repurposed as a reference repository. We value the wealth of knowledge that's been shared here over the years. You'll continue to have access to this treasure trove of knowledge, for search purposes only.
Join the TIBCO Community TIBCO Community is a collaborative space for users to share knowledge and support one another in making the best use of TIBCO products and services. There are several TIBCO WebFOCUS resources in the community.
From the Home page, select Predict: WebFOCUS to view articles, questions, and trending articles.
Select Products from the top navigation bar, scroll, and then select the TIBCO WebFOCUS product page to view product overview, articles, and discussions.
Request access to the private WebFOCUS User Group (login required) to network with fellow members.
Former myibi community members should have received an email on 8/3/22 to activate their user accounts to join the community. Check your Spam folder for the email. Please get in touch with us at community@tibco.com for further assistance. Reference the community FAQ to learn more about the community.
I don't think there is any such limitation on the number of the BY fields. I have used upto 15, 20 BY fields in some of my reports. so 3 in your case is not a limit at all. Try changing the order of the BY fields and see if the BY happens properly on "ccc". Should be some data problems or structure that might not do grouping correctly..
Thanks,
Ramkumar. WebFOCUS/Tableau Webfocus 8 / 7.7.02 Unix, Windows HTML/PDF/EXCEL/AHTML/XML/HTML5
Posts: 394 | Location: Chennai | Registered: December 02, 2009
Yes there is a limit. You can have upto 128 sort phrases(BY + ACROSS). But in your case, there should not be any issue. There could be some issue with data like extra space and that cause the issue. Thanks, Ram