As of December 1, 2020, Focal Point is retired and repurposed as a reference repository. We value the wealth of knowledge that's been shared here over the years. You'll continue to have access to this treasure trove of knowledge, for search purposes only.
Join the TIBCO Community TIBCO Community is a collaborative space for users to share knowledge and support one another in making the best use of TIBCO products and services. There are several TIBCO WebFOCUS resources in the community.
From the Home page, select Predict: WebFOCUS to view articles, questions, and trending articles.
Select Products from the top navigation bar, scroll, and then select the TIBCO WebFOCUS product page to view product overview, articles, and discussions.
Request access to the private WebFOCUS User Group (login required) to network with fellow members.
Former myibi community members should have received an email on 8/3/22 to activate their user accounts to join the community. Check your Spam folder for the email. Please get in touch with us at community@tibco.com for further assistance. Reference the community FAQ to learn more about the community.
So I would like to use this routine to list all the variables with their type and lengths. But how can I get an array of all the variable names?This message has been edited. Last edited by: <Kathryn Henning>,
This only will get variable names if they are 9 char or less. I am trying to get people out of the habit of using terrible variable names that are short but confusing. So this won't work for me. Obviously WF has the list stored in memory somewhere. Anyone know of another option that will work for variable names of any length?
Both & and && variables are listed with a non-truncated name and specifying how each of them got its value (-SET / -DEFAULT).This message has been edited. Last edited by: njsden,
Are you only interested in your application variables (the ones you control) or also internal ones such as &YYMD, &LINES, etc.?
I think SAVEPRINT excludes the latter from consideration so you'll have to pick which version (-? & vs. -? & SAVEPRINT) gives you the best bang for the buck given your reporting needs, or perhaps come up with your own technique to read both sets and merge the results somehow which is obviously not so straightforward due to truncated variables names.