As of December 1, 2020, Focal Point is retired and repurposed as a reference repository. We value the wealth of knowledge that's been shared here over the years. You'll continue to have access to this treasure trove of knowledge, for search purposes only.
Join the TIBCO Community TIBCO Community is a collaborative space for users to share knowledge and support one another in making the best use of TIBCO products and services. There are several TIBCO WebFOCUS resources in the community.
From the Home page, select Predict: WebFOCUS to view articles, questions, and trending articles.
Select Products from the top navigation bar, scroll, and then select the TIBCO WebFOCUS product page to view product overview, articles, and discussions.
Request access to the private WebFOCUS User Group (login required) to network with fellow members.
Former myibi community members should have received an email on 8/3/22 to activate their user accounts to join the community. Check your Spam folder for the email. Please get in touch with us at community@tibco.com for further assistance. Reference the community FAQ to learn more about the community.
I have SQL Server database columns that are defined as a BIT data type. These have values of either 0 or 1 stored in the database, which appear as such when doing a query in SQL Server Management Studio (SSMS). WebFOCUS, however, displays these as either 0 or -1. I have found a reference to this at iDM displays wrong value for SQLMSS 2008 BIT Data Type but from this "Solution" I take it that this was done by design.
My question is: How do you overcome the difference between what is "displayed" and what the actual value is? If I try to use a filter to limit the records to the -1 that is displayed, it does not find the records, because in the database the value is really 1. I CAN set up my filter to select records where that column is not equal to 0. This is just very non-intuitive and it seems there should be a better solution. Other than making defined fields for all of these, is there any other way to deal with these?
Thanks, ChrisThis message has been edited. Last edited by: <Kathryn Henning>,