As of December 1, 2020, Focal Point is retired and repurposed as a reference repository. We value the wealth of knowledge that's been shared here over the years. You'll continue to have access to this treasure trove of knowledge, for search purposes only.
Join the TIBCO Community TIBCO Community is a collaborative space for users to share knowledge and support one another in making the best use of TIBCO products and services. There are several TIBCO WebFOCUS resources in the community.
From the Home page, select Predict: WebFOCUS to view articles, questions, and trending articles.
Select Products from the top navigation bar, scroll, and then select the TIBCO WebFOCUS product page to view product overview, articles, and discussions.
Request access to the private WebFOCUS User Group (login required) to network with fellow members.
Former myibi community members should have received an email on 8/3/22 to activate their user accounts to join the community. Check your Spam folder for the email. Please get in touch with us at community@tibco.com for further assistance. Reference the community FAQ to learn more about the community.
I have an Issue in QA environment.I want to filter out some of the dates from the field called Reported_date ,those are in YYMD format and total 16 values ,
WHERE Reported_Date NE '1900/12/31' OR '2008/01/01' OR '2008/01/21' OR '2008/03/21' OR '2008/03/24' OR '2008/05/26' OR '2008/07/04' OR '2008/09/01' OR '2008/11/27' OR '2008/11/28' OR '2008/12/24' OR '2008/12/25' OR '2008/12/26' OR '2008/12/29' OR '2008/12/30' OR '2008/12/31';
when I ran the report Iam getting EDASERVER Crashed Error Message
But ,If I give only 12 out of 16 Date values Report is working fine..
Any suggestions,,
Thanks in Advance, SaikumarThis message has been edited. Last edited by: Kerry,
WebFOCUS 8103 Appstudio, Dev Studio MRE Client Windows 7, Serveron Unix. Excel, PDF, HTML,AHTML
You do realize, I hope, that by setting your selection criteria against a DEFINEd field, you could be creating a great deal of inefficiency. Your process would still need to read EVERY record, calculating your DEFINE field value and THEN throwing out the records that don't meet your criteria. You would be MUCH better off to use the REAL field that your define is based on. Guess it depends on the size of your database.
Regards,
Darin
In FOCUS since 1991 WF Server: 7.7.04 on Linux and Z/OS, ReportCaster, Self-Service, MRE, Java, Flex Data: DB2/UDB, Adabas, SQL Server Output: HTML,PDF,EXL2K/07, PS, AHTML, Flex WF Client: 77 on Linux w/Tomcat
Posts: 2298 | Location: Salt Lake City, Utah | Registered: February 02, 2007