As of December 1, 2020, Focal Point is retired and repurposed as a reference repository. We value the wealth of knowledge that's been shared here over the years. You'll continue to have access to this treasure trove of knowledge, for search purposes only.
Join the TIBCO Community TIBCO Community is a collaborative space for users to share knowledge and support one another in making the best use of TIBCO products and services. There are several TIBCO WebFOCUS resources in the community.
From the Home page, select Predict: WebFOCUS to view articles, questions, and trending articles.
Select Products from the top navigation bar, scroll, and then select the TIBCO WebFOCUS product page to view product overview, articles, and discussions.
Request access to the private WebFOCUS User Group (login required) to network with fellow members.
Former myibi community members should have received an email on 8/3/22 to activate their user accounts to join the community. Check your Spam folder for the email. Please get in touch with us at community@tibco.com for further assistance. Reference the community FAQ to learn more about the community.
Is there any practical difference whether report-wide settings appear in a "global" delaration (one not qualified by a "TYPE=" clause), or in a REPORT declaration (one opening with TYPE=REPORT)?
The GUI editor generates both. I wondered whether that's a matter of style or of necessesity.This message has been edited. Last edited by: <Kathryn Henning>,
- Jack Gross WF through 8.1.05
Posts: 1925 | Location: NYC | In FOCUS since 1983 | Registered: January 11, 2005
jack, what does a view source of the resulting html look like, in each case? wonder if you can determine from looking there what the differences are , if any, in the < style > bits vs within the < td > bits, or maybe even the < span > bits
In Focus since 1979///7706m/5 ;wintel 2008/64;OAM security; Oracle db, ///MRE/BID
Posts: 3811 | Location: Manhattan | Registered: October 28, 2003
"TYPE=REPORT set the "default" styling for the whole report, where TYPE=xxxx set a specific styling for that section of the report. "
Martin -- I know that.
I posted, bcs it looks to me as tho, when you park a section-specific setting (such as the top and bottom gaps) upstairs in the global declaration (alongside UNITS and PAPER, stuff that can only be specified once for the whole report) it becomes report-wide "immovable object" setting (i.e., cannot be over-ridden for a specific section) -- whereas in the REPORT section it creates just a report-wide "default" but can be over-ridden on a section-by-section basis.
Has anyone else come to a similar conclusion? And is there any indication of that in the documentation?
- Jack Gross WF through 8.1.05
Posts: 1925 | Location: NYC | In FOCUS since 1983 | Registered: January 11, 2005
Jack, I did not find anything in the doc. My experience is that there is also some undocumented feature about the relative position of each styling entry, most of which is not always intuitive. For example, I have to color code a field according to values. Although the different conditions are disjointed (not overlapping) the order of their appearance has an effect. Some good old trial-and-trial-again and documentation in the code for future releases differences...
Daniel In Focus since 1982 wf 8.202M/Win10/IIS/SSA - WrapApp Front End for WF
Posts: 1980 | Location: Tel Aviv, Israel | Registered: March 23, 2006