As of December 1, 2020, Focal Point is retired and repurposed as a reference repository. We value the wealth of knowledge that's been shared here over the years. You'll continue to have access to this treasure trove of knowledge, for search purposes only.
Join the TIBCO Community TIBCO Community is a collaborative space for users to share knowledge and support one another in making the best use of TIBCO products and services. There are several TIBCO WebFOCUS resources in the community.
From the Home page, select Predict: WebFOCUS to view articles, questions, and trending articles.
Select Products from the top navigation bar, scroll, and then select the TIBCO WebFOCUS product page to view product overview, articles, and discussions.
Request access to the private WebFOCUS User Group (login required) to network with fellow members.
Former myibi community members should have received an email on 8/3/22 to activate their user accounts to join the community. Check your Spam folder for the email. Please get in touch with us at community@tibco.com for further assistance. Reference the community FAQ to learn more about the community.
We have a VERY large database which has records dating back 8 years. The majority of the reports we run are against the current year or last year. Thinking it would be beneficial to pull and create an extract with just the data we principally run against.
Know in FOCUS that we could create a SAVE file which would be a sort of permanent-temporary/hold file. Saw in the WebFocus Help that the SAVE option is available. However, do not understand where this file would be and what format if we created it. Also, the Help wasn't really helpful with how to create it. Our initial database is a SQL database.This message has been edited. Last edited by: Kerry,
version 7.14 Windows and Unix servers Mostly html, and some excel outputs
I would try to work with the database team to partition the database and put proper indexes before pursuing the FOCUS database path. You might also need to get your security requirements laid out before you work with the FOCUS database. For the creation of FOCUS database, you can find some pointers here
Using WF 7.1.7/Dev Studio
Posts: 189 | Location: Boston, MA | Registered: July 12, 2005
When you want to report from an extracted file, in almost all cases you should use HOLD and not SAVE, because HOLD also created an accompanying MASTER file.
This being said, how large would be a file of the current year? According to what you say, it would be quite large. What else could you say about the file? For example, if the file contained data pertaining to cities, would the subsequent reports mostly address one city or the whole file? Are there specific data against which IF/WHERE statements are issued?
There are many more considerations which would have an impact on the structure of the extracted file and how to build it.
So, I would suggest some more thought and analysis.
Daniel In Focus since 1982 wf 8.202M/Win10/IIS/SSA - WrapApp Front End for WF
Posts: 1980 | Location: Tel Aviv, Israel | Registered: March 23, 2006
definitely go the FOCUS database route, we seem to agree. a HOLD file is a flat file, and won't save you much, those are usually work-in-progress files in the creation of a swell focus database. XFOCUS files can hold much more than FOCUS files, and make their own swell multi-dim indices. I suggest a focus database structure, One xfocus file for each year, identical structures, so they can be read either individually or UNION'd together.
In Focus since 1979///7706m/5 ;wintel 2008/64;OAM security; Oracle db, ///MRE/BID
Posts: 3811 | Location: Manhattan | Registered: October 28, 2003
JI, The 'best method' might be different in different operating systems and your profile is empty so I am not sure of the best answer.
If you are in the mainframe (MVS or CMS) environment I would recommend that you TABLE each segment into a HOLD file and then load the segments into an alternate MASTER using MODIFY. This might take more time the first time you do this but you can use it forever and it will save you a lot of time in the future. You should also organize the history into chunks of time (1 year, 3 years, 5 years, etc.). Pick one time period and stick to it in the future to make maintenance easier. I would use yearly but I work for an insurance company and the files are huge!
Here are some reasons why I would do this: 1. Your history files will be easily access from FOCUS in the future and since they have the same format you can run your current reports against history data with a one line change in the code 2. Your 'new' FOCUS databases will be more efficiently reported from since they will be 0% disorganized with no empty pages to increase your I/O 3. You can put the real old files to tape and only reference them when needed 4. You can pick different time periods to combine to report from via the USE command.
If you are not in the mainframe environment then I am sure there are other methods that would be easier.
Split your files by year. Then have a 'use' statement concatenating the years as needed ( controlled by a DM statement based upon the dates requested). User CAR2004.FOC AS CAR CAR2005.FOC AS CAR CAR2006.FOC AS CAR END