As of December 1, 2020, Focal Point is retired and repurposed as a reference repository. We value the wealth of knowledge that's been shared here over the years. You'll continue to have access to this treasure trove of knowledge, for search purposes only.
Join the TIBCO Community TIBCO Community is a collaborative space for users to share knowledge and support one another in making the best use of TIBCO products and services. There are several TIBCO WebFOCUS resources in the community.
From the Home page, select Predict: WebFOCUS to view articles, questions, and trending articles.
Select Products from the top navigation bar, scroll, and then select the TIBCO WebFOCUS product page to view product overview, articles, and discussions.
Request access to the private WebFOCUS User Group (login required) to network with fellow members.
Former myibi community members should have received an email on 8/3/22 to activate their user accounts to join the community. Check your Spam folder for the email. Please get in touch with us at community@tibco.com for further assistance. Reference the community FAQ to learn more about the community.
When creating a hold file from and Oracle table and joining the hold file to an Oracle table, would it more efficient if the hold file were an Oracle table: ON TABLE HOLD FORMAT SQLORA?This message has been edited. Last edited by: JohnB,
WF 7.7.03, Windows 7, HTML, Excel, PDF
Posts: 225 | Location: San Francisco Bay Area, California | Registered: October 26, 2006
However there is another consideration that needs to be taken into account.
What mathod of access do you use to oracle? If it is a generic WebFOCUS id (explict in WFS terms) then you may have potential issues if this is for an end-user report.
The reason is that you must do a drop table if you are to reuse the name.
This potentially means that user B could drop the table while it is being used by user A or perhaps pick up incorrect content if the failure to drop and create failed because of system locks.