As of December 1, 2020, Focal Point is retired and repurposed as a reference repository. We value the wealth of knowledge that's been shared here over the years. You'll continue to have access to this treasure trove of knowledge, for search purposes only.
Join the TIBCO Community TIBCO Community is a collaborative space for users to share knowledge and support one another in making the best use of TIBCO products and services. There are several TIBCO WebFOCUS resources in the community.
From the Home page, select Predict: WebFOCUS to view articles, questions, and trending articles.
Select Products from the top navigation bar, scroll, and then select the TIBCO WebFOCUS product page to view product overview, articles, and discussions.
Request access to the private WebFOCUS User Group (login required) to network with fellow members.
Former myibi community members should have received an email on 8/3/22 to activate their user accounts to join the community. Check your Spam folder for the email. Please get in touch with us at community@tibco.com for further assistance. Reference the community FAQ to learn more about the community.
Just looking for thoughts and/or experiences on using other reporting tools such as BRIO compared to WebFocus. Thnx! -cThis message has been edited. Last edited by: FP Mod Chuck,
Brio, Cognos, Microstrategy, Microsoft and Information Builders WebFOCUS are all reviewed in the round-up. Business Objects and SAS were invited but chose not to participate.
PC Magazine also just published a review of WebFOCUS here:
You might not get too many other responses here because we're really just getting this forum up and running (it's less than a month old) and I'm not sure we have too many WebFOCUS developers on the forum yet who have experience with other BI tools.
Hope this helps!
-Chris
Posts: 55 | Location: New York | Registered: March 07, 2003
with some experience touching alot of bi tools, you might want to first separate them by thin-client delivery vs. thick-client delivery(or what microsoft is calling "smart client".) eg cognos is thick client. Then you might want to look at the extent of the underlying language. All these tools sell well and present well to people who don't write code, but to people who DO write code, the flash of the gui tool just isn't even interesting...it misses the point we're looking for. So, if you're a code writer, concentrate on the math you can do in the underlying language, because as developer you need cool math to be able to create your underlying databases...then the flashy gui stuff just allows non-tech users to have fun interfacing and createing their own reports from the awesome data structures you've created for them. Ask all your vendors, for example, to create a cartesion product on the fly...and see who chokes.
Posts: 3811 | Location: Manhattan | Registered: October 28, 2003
I evaluated COGNOS for our area. COGNOS is an easy to use tool and does fine if you have all your data in the database. The biggest drawback was joining to outside files. We ended doing the join in Access with a UNION and resulted in long response time.
We scrapped COGNOS and moved to WebFOCUS!
Posts: 428 | Location: Springfield, MA | Registered: May 07, 2003
Carol (Hello again) ... I'm seeing some of those 'drawbacks' which converting reports from Cognos to WebFOCUS, especially with their 'ROUNDING' of deciaml numbers, not to mention converting their JOINs.
In FOCUS Since 1983 ~ from FOCUS to WebFOCUS. Current: WebFOCUS Administrator at FIS Worldpay | 8204, 8206
Posts: 3132 | Location: Tennessee, Nashville area | Registered: February 23, 2005