As of December 1, 2020, Focal Point is retired and repurposed as a reference repository. We value the wealth of knowledge that's been shared here over the years. You'll continue to have access to this treasure trove of knowledge, for search purposes only.
Join the TIBCO Community TIBCO Community is a collaborative space for users to share knowledge and support one another in making the best use of TIBCO products and services. There are several TIBCO WebFOCUS resources in the community.
From the Home page, select Predict: WebFOCUS to view articles, questions, and trending articles.
Select Products from the top navigation bar, scroll, and then select the TIBCO WebFOCUS product page to view product overview, articles, and discussions.
Request access to the private WebFOCUS User Group (login required) to network with fellow members.
Former myibi community members should have received an email on 8/3/22 to activate their user accounts to join the community. Check your Spam folder for the email. Please get in touch with us at community@tibco.com for further assistance. Reference the community FAQ to learn more about the community.
If you search for the following it will lead you to the post I am interested in: "posted March 03, 2016 10:33 AM". I've included the little snippet of code below:
TABLE FILE HOLDEVERYTHINGDISTOFFICE SUM HOLDEVERYTHINGDISTOFFICE.SEG01.CLOSED_ALL_REQUESTS AS 'CLREQS' ON TABLE NOTOTAL ON TABLE HOLD AS HOLDCLOSEDTOTALS FORMAT FOCUS END
-RUN -READFILE HOLDCLOSEDTOTALS -TYPE CLREQS IS &CLREQS
In that statement there is a hold "HOLDCLOSEDTOTALS". Since this does not define the hold as existing in foccache like so, ON TABLE HOLD AS 'foccache/HOLDCLOSEDTOTALS', does that mean it is possible for this file to not be secured to a unique request / session? Maybe that's okay in this persons case, I didn't read the entirety of what they are trying to achieve. I was searching for something else and stumbled across this code and thought, "I should ask about this", and decided to use this specific snippet as an example of what I'm looking at.
Thanks for any input.This message has been edited. Last edited by: FP Mod Chuck,
Okay, so I have a series of guids that are request specifc and should be cached as they are used in the "child" procedures of my main report procedure. If I want these to be nuked at the end of that main procedures run I should just use the normal hold without foccache then?
However, if there's an "APP HOLD" statement preceding the "ON TABLE HOLD AS {filename} FORMAT FOCUS" it will be a 'permanent' file and will be accessible to anyone who has access to that app folder as long as that file exists. It will also be overwritten by subsequent executions of another "ON TABLE HOLD AS {filename} FORMAT FOCUS" when preceded by the "APP HOLD" statements.
Summary: There's several pieces to this puzzle. There's also the "APP DELETEF" command to think about...
Posts: 3132 | Location: Tennessee, Nashville area | Registered: February 23, 2005