As of December 1, 2020, Focal Point is retired and repurposed as a reference repository. We value the wealth of knowledge that's been shared here over the years. You'll continue to have access to this treasure trove of knowledge, for search purposes only.
Join the TIBCO Community TIBCO Community is a collaborative space for users to share knowledge and support one another in making the best use of TIBCO products and services. There are several TIBCO WebFOCUS resources in the community.
From the Home page, select Predict: WebFOCUS to view articles, questions, and trending articles.
Select Products from the top navigation bar, scroll, and then select the TIBCO WebFOCUS product page to view product overview, articles, and discussions.
Request access to the private WebFOCUS User Group (login required) to network with fellow members.
Former myibi community members should have received an email on 8/3/22 to activate their user accounts to join the community. Check your Spam folder for the email. Please get in touch with us at community@tibco.com for further assistance. Reference the community FAQ to learn more about the community.
My general and long-standing feeling is that if you are not going to do arithmetic with a field even if it has numbers in it, then they should be defined as alphanumeric.
What kind of file is this? Would this be a simple matter of changing the usage format in the master? Also there are tricks you can use in the master definition like using defines to get the fields in the formats most useful to you.
In Business view you can create folder like structure and group all measures under one and dimensions into different folders like account_details, time_dimension and so on.
You can define dimensions and measures in the Synonym Editor in Developer Studio. Click on the Modeling View Tab. Then from the Modeling View select Synonym -- Dimension Builder.
Do a search in Developer Studio help on Dimensions.
WF 7.7.01 Reporting Server on zLinux or Windows Client on linux Output formats - EXL2K, HTML, PDF
Originally posted by GinnyJakes: My general and long-standing feeling is that if you are not going to do arithmetic with a field even if it has numbers in it, then they should be defined as alphanumeric.
What kind of file is this? Would this be a simple matter of changing the usage format in the master? Also there are tricks you can use in the master definition like using defines to get the fields in the formats most useful to you.
Just some thoughts...
This works generally, but think of a column like week number in year (i.e. values 1 - 52). It is a perfect example of a dimension rather than a measure, since you will never do any arithmetic with the field. But when you make it an alpha, it sorts incorrectly:
1 10 11 12 13 .. 2 20 21 .. etc.
I really wish the tool would allow you to specify if a field is a dimension or a measure. In the meantime, do you know a good workaround?
WF Server: 7.6.10 on Linux, ReportCaster, MRE, Flex Data: Oracle Output: HTML,PDF,EXL2K, AHTML, Flex WF Client: 7.6.10 on Windows XP
I'm not familiar with InfoAssist, so I don't know how much latitude you have in modifying the work flow. So this is a wild guess kind of idea. Is it possible to create a dummy master (with accompanying access file, if necessary) that has the desired columns defined in such a way (numeric versus alpha) so InfoAssist will correctly display them as dimensions and measures? After the user selects columns for the report, can you insert a procedure or some code (or use a LET) to point the query to the real master/data source?
WebFOCUS 7.7.05
Posts: 1213 | Location: Seattle, Washington - USA | Registered: October 22, 2007
Define your week number as A2 and use a function to insert leading zeroes i.e. 01,02,03,...,09,10,11 etc, then it sorts correctly!
Of course, for week numbers, sometimes you do want to perform arithmetic (number of weeks elapsed etc), so have both versions in your table and use whichever is relevant.
WebFocus 7.6.11 IBM iSeries
Posts: 14 | Location: Leeds, England | Registered: May 16, 2005