As of December 1, 2020, Focal Point is retired and repurposed as a reference repository. We value the wealth of knowledge that's been shared here over the years. You'll continue to have access to this treasure trove of knowledge, for search purposes only.
Join the TIBCO Community TIBCO Community is a collaborative space for users to share knowledge and support one another in making the best use of TIBCO products and services. There are several TIBCO WebFOCUS resources in the community.
From the Home page, select Predict: WebFOCUS to view articles, questions, and trending articles.
Select Products from the top navigation bar, scroll, and then select the TIBCO WebFOCUS product page to view product overview, articles, and discussions.
Request access to the private WebFOCUS User Group (login required) to network with fellow members.
Former myibi community members should have received an email on 8/3/22 to activate their user accounts to join the community. Check your Spam folder for the email. Please get in touch with us at community@tibco.com for further assistance. Reference the community FAQ to learn more about the community.
I'd like to know if WebFOCUS 8 can be installed on the same machine as WebFOCUS 7.7.x, without having to use a virtual machine. Perhaps by using different port numbers for the client and reporting servers of the two versions...
Thanks,
Francis
Give me code, or give me retirement. In FOCUS since 1991
Production: WF 7.7.05M, Dev Studio, BID, MRE, WebSphere, DB2 / Test: WF 8.1.05M, App Studio, BI Portal, Report Caster, jQuery, HighCharts, Apache Tomcat, MS SQL Server
I don't see why not. Just put them in a seperate directories. I never just install on the root drive, I always install a version in a directory to keep them seperate. /WebF77 or /WebF8.
My guess is that Matt is correct, just putting them in different directories should be enough. The reporting servers though would need to use different ports. You probably can run the clients out of the same tomcat too if you want. I currently have my dev setup with 3 clients running out of one tomcat(2 of them for testing different things 1 for report development. 2 of the clients are 7703 HF7 and the other is a base 7703) and had at one point 2 reporting servers running off my other box (we recently went from RS 7703M to 7704M and I had them running in parallel while I configured them). I would assume you should be able to do the same thing with WF7/WF8. But you wouldn't be able to share the same basedir like I do...
Eric Woerle 8.1.05M Gen 913- Reporting Server Unix 8.1.05 Client Unix Oracle 11.2.0.2
Posts: 750 | Location: Warrenville, IL | Registered: January 08, 2013
If you want both Client/Server installations to operate as if they were "regular" installations with the default context names etc., then the two points to watch out for are "approot" and the web server/application server (e.g. tomcat) pieces. The "approot" part is easily addressed if you install in two completely separate directories as Matt suggested. However, for the tomcat part you preferably want to have two separate tomcat instances/services running (obviously not sharing ports). I think the installation guide articulates it quite well: Do not choose any of the automatic web server or application server configuration options for additional WebFOCUS instances. You must manually configure all but the first WebFOCUS instance you install.
WebFOCUS 8.2.06 mostly Windows Server
Posts: 195 | Location: Johannesburg, South Africa | Registered: September 13, 2008
You can install different versions of Developer Studio also. They will automatically install into their own directories. You toggle between them by running 'ThisFoci.bat' from the appropriate bin directory. In my case they are c:\ibi\DevStudio77\bin and c:\ibi\DevStudio80\bin.
Developer Studio 7.7.05 Application Studio 8.0.09 Windows 7 All Formats
Posts: 16 | Location: Seattle, WA | Registered: November 29, 2012
Why yes they can! We have a separate .bat script we run for each one in order to set up the necessary environment. I believe an ibi person (Brian Larkin) created these for us.
Here's one that changes 7.7 to 8. Modify the 5 lines at the bottom to create one that does the reverse (changes environment from 8 to ? (yours)).
cls
ECHO OFF REM The next three lines (following these comments) allow this batch file to be "Run as Administrator" on Vista and higher REM NOTE: Running as administrator changes the default directory to the system directory which prevents proper registration PUSHD . FOR /F %%I IN ("%~s0") DO SET BATDIR=%%~dpI CD /D "%BATDIR%" ECHO ON
REM Introduce a delay of 2 seconds between each regsvr32 command
I think if you want to keep the two separate and running at the same time, and have the same alias, just use a different instance of tomcat and run on a different port.
The migration itself isn’t difficult, it’s the “modernization” part of it to take advantage of the Resource Template and security is where I went south. It’s not fully documented yet. I wanted to clean up the folder structure of what WF 7 does in MRE and simplify it so I created all brand new folders using the Enterprise Domain Resource Template and copying over my migrated existing content. By doing this, I broke the handles that linked fex’s in HTML pages and other fex’s.
Fortunately, we don’t have a lot of content in MRE so the work to re-create and re-link items wasn’t that extensive. IBI does have a method to follow now to help with the “modernization” to not break the handles. I believe they will be covering that at Summit this year.
So far, I like the new version. The security is overwhelming and I am still learning a lot about it. I like the integration with LDAP. I like the new functionality of “Alternate” zones if you are using Single Sign on you can specify an IP range to bypass SSO to login. This is very helpful if you are in a clustered environment and need to change a setting on each node of the cluster.
As far as development, I haven’t noticed too much of a difference, although I haven’t done really any new development, just more or less minor changes to existing code. I did notice that the Tree Control has more functionality, which was a plus for me.