As of December 1, 2020, Focal Point is retired and repurposed as a reference repository. We value the wealth of knowledge that's been shared here over the years. You'll continue to have access to this treasure trove of knowledge, for search purposes only.
Join the TIBCO Community TIBCO Community is a collaborative space for users to share knowledge and support one another in making the best use of TIBCO products and services. There are several TIBCO WebFOCUS resources in the community.
From the Home page, select Predict: WebFOCUS to view articles, questions, and trending articles.
Select Products from the top navigation bar, scroll, and then select the TIBCO WebFOCUS product page to view product overview, articles, and discussions.
Request access to the private WebFOCUS User Group (login required) to network with fellow members.
Former myibi community members should have received an email on 8/3/22 to activate their user accounts to join the community. Check your Spam folder for the email. Please get in touch with us at community@tibco.com for further assistance. Reference the community FAQ to learn more about the community.
I have a report running in production under WF 7, which I am testing under WF 8 (specifically, 8.0.07).
I find that the vertical spacing is radically changed.
In page-heading text with a surrounding box, the box now overlaps the top line of text.
The "leading" (spacing) between detail lines of report text is also reduced: A sort-break that formerly occupied most of the available area (between the page heading and page footing) is now crowded into the top half, leaving the bottom half blank.
Anyone else encounter this? Any suggestions?This message has been edited. Last edited by: <Kathryn Henning>,
- Jack Gross WF through 8.1.05
Posts: 1925 | Location: NYC | In FOCUS since 1983 | Registered: January 11, 2005
That's helpful to know. But that article is primarily about vertical expansion. The issue here is horizontal expansion - leading to off-center appearance of centered headings, and/or paneled output.
When I applied a background color to the text fields of an existing report, to reveal what WFRS calculates as the extent of the fields, I found that the widths were surprisingly large. The report used Arial font, and apparently the width on the physical page was designed to accommodate the worst case (all capital W's).
That's understandable, until you apply styling to control field width. But I found setting the width (whether by WIDTH or SQUEEZE or WRAP) had no effect.
Is there a special incantation needed to get wordwrap in PDF output?
The existing report resorted to OVER (and PARAG and GETTOK) to achieve a rough-hewn word-wrap, but true wordwrap would produce better formatting.
I know FOCUS report syntax was designed when fixed-width fonts (on band printers...) were the only game in town. (Like, what does <46> in a heading mean in the context of proportional fonts?) But still...This message has been edited. Last edited by: j.gross,
- Jack Gross WF through 8.1.05
Posts: 1925 | Location: NYC | In FOCUS since 1983 | Registered: January 11, 2005