As of December 1, 2020, Focal Point is retired and repurposed as a reference repository. We value the wealth of knowledge that's been shared here over the years. You'll continue to have access to this treasure trove of knowledge, for search purposes only.
Join the TIBCO Community TIBCO Community is a collaborative space for users to share knowledge and support one another in making the best use of TIBCO products and services. There are several TIBCO WebFOCUS resources in the community.
From the Home page, select Predict: WebFOCUS to view articles, questions, and trending articles.
Select Products from the top navigation bar, scroll, and then select the TIBCO WebFOCUS product page to view product overview, articles, and discussions.
Request access to the private WebFOCUS User Group (login required) to network with fellow members.
Former myibi community members should have received an email on 8/3/22 to activate their user accounts to join the community. Check your Spam folder for the email. Please get in touch with us at community@tibco.com for further assistance. Reference the community FAQ to learn more about the community.
I have a compound PDF report that is not displaying correctly.
The first of the two component reports appears to be fine. The second one shows up in the right spot, but for some reason the first 50 or so records do not appear.
I am retrieving the records via a SQL Server stored procedure. The stored procedure does return the missing records, and if I run the component report individually in DevStudio the missing records appear there, too.
To me, then, this pretty strongly suggests that the problem has something to do with the compounding. I just haven't yet found anything that would explain this result. Does anyone have any experience with a similar problem? I will greatly appreciate any insight anyone can provide. Thanks!
This is the text of my .fex file for the main report:
If you delete the first report, do all the records from the second report show? If yes, it is possible that you don't have your overflow set up quite right and the top of report 2 is getting covered up by report 1.
Ginny, thanks. I'll give that a look. I do see the headers for the second component report at the bottom of page 1, after the end of the first component report. Page 2 of the PDF then shows what would be the second page of results from the second component report, seemingly skipping the first page of results from the second component report. The presence of the headers for the second component report seems to indicate that it's not lying under the first component report, but I'll check out your suggestion.
PROD WebFOCUS 7.6.10 Windows Server 2008 SQL Server 2005 DEV WebFOCUS 7.6.10 Windows Server 2003 R2 SQL Server 2005 OUTPUTS HTML, AHTML, PDF
Posts: 13 | Location: Indianapolis, IN USA | Registered: August 03, 2009
Ginny, that does turn out to have been it. The compound report was using "OVERFLOW: auto" and the auto setting doesn't appear to have been doing it right.
I set the OVERFLOW to flowing, changed the position of the second report (there was a negative value in there that was also throwing an error), and went into PDF Layout Painter to manually set the relationship between the reports. Once these three things were done, the report worked properly.
Thanks very much for your help!
PROD WebFOCUS 7.6.10 Windows Server 2008 SQL Server 2005 DEV WebFOCUS 7.6.10 Windows Server 2003 R2 SQL Server 2005 OUTPUTS HTML, AHTML, PDF
Posts: 13 | Location: Indianapolis, IN USA | Registered: August 03, 2009
Just another IBI/WebFOCUS idiosyncracy, I suppose.
Doug,
For info, the need to put your code within [ code] and [/code] tags is nothing to do with WebFOCUS but is how the forum software is designed to cope. There are many forums out there (that you may encounter) that also have the same requirements.
Just so that you know
T
In FOCUS since 1986
WebFOCUS Server 8.2.01M, thru 8.2.07 on Windows Svr 2008 R2
WebFOCUS App Studio 8.2.06 standalone on Windows 10
Posts: 5694 | Location: United Kingdom | Registered: April 08, 2004