As of December 1, 2020, Focal Point is retired and repurposed as a reference repository. We value the wealth of knowledge that's been shared here over the years. You'll continue to have access to this treasure trove of knowledge, for search purposes only.
Join the TIBCO Community TIBCO Community is a collaborative space for users to share knowledge and support one another in making the best use of TIBCO products and services. There are several TIBCO WebFOCUS resources in the community.
From the Home page, select Predict: WebFOCUS to view articles, questions, and trending articles.
Select Products from the top navigation bar, scroll, and then select the TIBCO WebFOCUS product page to view product overview, articles, and discussions.
Request access to the private WebFOCUS User Group (login required) to network with fellow members.
Former myibi community members should have received an email on 8/3/22 to activate their user accounts to join the community. Check your Spam folder for the email. Please get in touch with us at community@tibco.com for further assistance. Reference the community FAQ to learn more about the community.
You mean to check if the file used in the IBI.FIL command is empty? If so, you may want to check OS commands to see if the OS has something that can do that for you (for instance unix has something called 'test -f'). Otherwise you could try to use DM to do a -READ from the file. If return code indicates a record has been read, the file is not empty.
GamP
- Using AS 8.2.01 on Windows 10 - IE11.
in Focus since 1988
Posts: 1961 | Location: Netherlands | Registered: September 25, 2007
Waz has it. Immediately after you create the hold file, examine (or capture) the value in &LINES and make your decision based on that. At the end of your focexec you can use the logic:
-IF &LINES EQ 0 THEN GOTO EMPTYRPT
Posts: 1012 | Location: At the Mast | Registered: May 17, 2007
If you are creating the file in WebFOCUS then Waz is obviously correct. However !IBI.FIL. can also be used to serve up static content that has been filedef'd in which case GamP is correct.