As of December 1, 2020, Focal Point is retired and repurposed as a reference repository. We value the wealth of knowledge that's been shared here over the years. You'll continue to have access to this treasure trove of knowledge, for search purposes only.
Join the TIBCO Community TIBCO Community is a collaborative space for users to share knowledge and support one another in making the best use of TIBCO products and services. There are several TIBCO WebFOCUS resources in the community.
From the Home page, select Predict: WebFOCUS to view articles, questions, and trending articles.
Select Products from the top navigation bar, scroll, and then select the TIBCO WebFOCUS product page to view product overview, articles, and discussions.
Request access to the private WebFOCUS User Group (login required) to network with fellow members.
Former myibi community members should have received an email on 8/3/22 to activate their user accounts to join the community. Check your Spam folder for the email. Please get in touch with us at community@tibco.com for further assistance. Reference the community FAQ to learn more about the community.
I am new to webFocus but know a lot about db programming and SQL.
I have a problem where I am getting the error
'(FOC1071) VALUE FOR JOIN 'TO' FIELD OUT OF SEQUENCE.'
I looked this up online and a moderator suggested (to another) that they should format HOLD aka (i think) on table hold format focus. I do not know how to implement this.
I use MATCH to create the HOLD.
MATCH FILE file1 SUM col1 FST.col2 BY att1 BY att2 WHERE att3 EQ 'EXAMPLE' RUN FILE file2 SUM col3 BY att1 BY att2 AFTER MATCH HOLD OLD-AND-NEW END
JOIN file3.match IN file3 TO ALL HOLD.att1 IN HOLD J1 WHERE file3.att6 EQ 1 END
how would I implement the change to fix my problem?
thanks in advanced for your help, if you need anymore help please let me know I can find it out.
Just as an update, I removed ALL from the JOIN and I was able to run the program. I still haven't gotten actually data to come through. I also know that the original programmer wanted ALL to be in the JOIN for a reason.
I guess I am just looking for information on why I should be expecting these results.
file3.match and HOLD.att1 have the same degree, should they also have the same name, should I rename the fields?
CurtisA,
The first place I see the hold table (I guess where it is defined) is within the MATCH. can I do what you suggest before or after the MATCH and not have one over write the other?