Focal Point Banner


As of December 1, 2020, Focal Point is retired and repurposed as a reference repository. We value the wealth of knowledge that's been shared here over the years. You'll continue to have access to this treasure trove of knowledge, for search purposes only.

Join the TIBCO Community
TIBCO Community is a collaborative space for users to share knowledge and support one another in making the best use of TIBCO products and services. There are several TIBCO WebFOCUS resources in the community.

  • From the Home page, select Predict: WebFOCUS to view articles, questions, and trending articles.
  • Select Products from the top navigation bar, scroll, and then select the TIBCO WebFOCUS product page to view product overview, articles, and discussions.
  • Request access to the private WebFOCUS User Group (login required) to network with fellow members.

Former myibi community members should have received an email on 8/3/22 to activate their user accounts to join the community. Check your Spam folder for the email. Please get in touch with us at community@tibco.com for further assistance. Reference the community FAQ to learn more about the community.


Focal Point    Focal Point Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  WebFOCUS/FOCUS Forum on Focal Point     NOCOLS Option for Master Files

Read-Only Read-Only Topic
Go
Search
Notify
Tools
NOCOLS Option for Master Files
 Login/Join
 
Gold member
posted
Does anyone know the benefits vs. liabilities assoiciated with using the NOCOLS option for creating master files? From reading the documentation it appears that this would be the prefered option since modification of the underlying data source does not require modification of the master file. I realize that if you do defines in master files you cannot use NOCOLS and I assume if you do DBA security in master files you couldn't use NOCOLS. But other than that, are there any drawbacks? TIA....Kelly
 
Posts: 90 | Location: Tinker AFB | Registered: June 03, 2003Report This Post
Master
posted Hide Post
The main benefit and purpose is, if the under line Datasource (TABLE) is changed on a regular and often bases then there is no needed to regenerate the METADATA. With that said the drawback, which has to be weighted, is that for every tool that needs METADATA info will now have to query the datasource to get it. Tools like Report Assist, Report Painter, ETL/Data Migrator, etc... So if the benefit out weights the drawback then NOCOLS can be useful.

Hope this helps
 
Posts: 865 | Registered: May 24, 2004Report This Post
Gold member
posted Hide Post
Thanks Scott. Do you know if there are any performance hits using NOCOLS?
 
Posts: 90 | Location: Tinker AFB | Registered: June 03, 2003Report This Post
Master
posted Hide Post
I'm not sure. There could be. The best way to find out would be to open a case with NY.
 
Posts: 865 | Registered: May 24, 2004Report This Post
Master
posted Hide Post
K.S.

Just got of the Phone with the "TOP DOG" in NY. He says that there is a performance hit. Even when running reports it still has to hit the system catalog to get the information. Good info, and a important thing to weight in determining if you should or should not use NOCOLS.

Scott
 
Posts: 865 | Registered: May 24, 2004Report This Post
Gold member
posted Hide Post
Thanks a lot. I thought there might be some performance issues. I'll test before using. See ya....
 
Posts: 90 | Location: Tinker AFB | Registered: June 03, 2003Report This Post
  Powered by Social Strata  

Read-Only Read-Only Topic

Focal Point    Focal Point Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  WebFOCUS/FOCUS Forum on Focal Point     NOCOLS Option for Master Files

Copyright © 1996-2020 Information Builders