Focal Point Banner


As of December 1, 2020, Focal Point is retired and repurposed as a reference repository. We value the wealth of knowledge that's been shared here over the years. You'll continue to have access to this treasure trove of knowledge, for search purposes only.

Join the TIBCO Community
TIBCO Community is a collaborative space for users to share knowledge and support one another in making the best use of TIBCO products and services. There are several TIBCO WebFOCUS resources in the community.

  • From the Home page, select Predict: WebFOCUS to view articles, questions, and trending articles.
  • Select Products from the top navigation bar, scroll, and then select the TIBCO WebFOCUS product page to view product overview, articles, and discussions.
  • Request access to the private WebFOCUS User Group (login required) to network with fellow members.

Former myibi community members should have received an email on 8/3/22 to activate their user accounts to join the community. Check your Spam folder for the email. Please get in touch with us at community@tibco.com for further assistance. Reference the community FAQ to learn more about the community.


Focal Point    Focal Point Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  WebFOCUS/FOCUS Forum on Focal Point     [SOLVED]Compressed against uncompressed catalogues[SOLVED]

Read-Only Read-Only Topic
Go
Search
Notify
Tools
[SOLVED]Compressed against uncompressed catalogues[SOLVED]
 Login/Join
 
Silver Member
posted
Hi,

In the Windows Server 2003 you can have compressed catalogue. Can we use a compressed catalouge for WF databases? If yes, is there any performance loss.

This message has been edited. Last edited by: Robert Teo,


A message from the darks side, there is!
 
Posts: 39 | Registered: August 28, 2007Report This Post
<JG>
posted
That very much depends on the system.

The only real answer is a physical test on YOUR system.

Compression always has an overhead. How much ?. Test it.

If you really need to compress disks on a server then you
really do need to talk with the support people because as
has been stated in a very recent post it's so cheap to add
capacity.
 
Report This Post
Silver Member
posted Hide Post
Thank's for that answer.

With the current crisis I understand that companies will be trimming not only the fat but also the meat, just hope they don't cut down to tne bone.

Because of the outsourcing agreement here between HP and our customer, we have just been imformed how much disk space cost and boy it's not cheap. They pay per month more then what a 1TB mobile disk cost at the local PC shop.


A message from the darks side, there is!
 
Posts: 39 | Registered: August 28, 2007Report This Post
  Powered by Social Strata  

Read-Only Read-Only Topic

Focal Point    Focal Point Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  WebFOCUS/FOCUS Forum on Focal Point     [SOLVED]Compressed against uncompressed catalogues[SOLVED]

Copyright © 1996-2020 Information Builders