Focal Point
[CLOSED] Animations should be a lot faster

This topic can be found at:
https://forums.informationbuilders.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/7971057331/m/8177090526

October 12, 2012, 04:59 PM
Marc97229
[CLOSED] Animations should be a lot faster
Animations are fun to watch the first time. The second time not so much. The third time they become annoying: we have a stacked graph that has an animation that takes about three seconds to complete. Way too long.

How can we reduce the waiting time?

This message has been edited. Last edited by: Kerry,


WebFOCUS 8.0.0.8, Windows 7
October 14, 2012, 04:32 PM
Waz
Anyone out there with WebFOCUS 8 ?

I guess this is part of the new stuff.

At this stage if no one replies, put a case in with Techsupport.


Waz...

Prod:WebFOCUS 7.6.10/8.1.04Upgrade:WebFOCUS 8.2.07OS:LinuxOutputs:HTML, PDF, Excel, PPT
In Focus since 1984
Pity the lost knowledge of an old programmer!

October 16, 2012, 05:10 AM
Wep5622
Animations should be off by default even. What's the point of making users wait for their information?

I suspect that the only people who are interested in animations are those who do presentations about WF8.


WebFOCUS 8.1.03, Windows 7-64/2008-64, IBM DB2/400, Oracle 11g & RDB, MS SQL-Server 2005, SAP, PostgreSQL 11, Output: HTML, PDF, Excel 2010
: Member of User Group Benelux :
June 09, 2013, 03:01 PM
Marc97229
If you have used InfoAssist to turn on animations, you can find a JSON object in your FEX:

*GRAPH_JS
"introAnimation": {
"enabled": true
},

To reduce the duration of an animation change it to something like

*GRAPH_JS
"introAnimation": {
"enabled": true,
"duration": 300
},

300 milliseconds is a nice, moderate compromise.


WebFOCUS 8.0.0.8, Windows 7
June 10, 2013, 10:41 AM
eric.woerle
Wep,

where as I do agree with you on animations being a waste of time... There is something to be said about the user experience. Animations add to that user experience and can sometimes be the difference between adoption and failure. I think Marc's solution of minimizing the animation to palatable length is a good solution for getting your user to their information quickly while still providing the razzle dazzle that end users enjoy.


Eric Woerle
8.1.05M Gen 913- Reporting Server Unix
8.1.05 Client Unix
Oracle 11.2.0.2
June 11, 2013, 05:59 AM
Twanette
This is a slight diversion from the original "technical" topic ... but ...

Like Wep, I too am always challenging the real value of animation, but ultimately I realise I need to share Eric's view.

The keynote speaker at Summit was quite a "cool dude" and showed some very interesting visual representations of data.

He discussed a point that stuck in my mind though.

He called it the OOH/AAH principle - which is how we should measure any form of visualisation of data.

Your first reaction should always be OOH - a positive OOH obviously Cool i.e. you see something that is visually appealing / you see something that catches your attention.

Then your second reaction should be AAH - when you understand what it is that the visualisation is representing.

A good rule of thumb though? And as developers we need to evaluate what we create from the perspective of the "end user".

So if animation will appeal to the end user, then it should be there!

But remember - a pig with lipstick is still a pig! Wink


WebFOCUS 8.2.06 mostly Windows Server
June 11, 2013, 09:13 AM
<Emily Duensing>
I believe there are a couple of settings for animation so you can control the timing as well as only do it once. Like it was said above, the first time is cool, but after that it is just annoying. There is now a setting so the animation only happens once. Not totally sure which release that is surfaced in; possibly production, maybe the next.
July 02, 2013, 02:49 PM
Doug
quote:
What's the point of making users wait for their information?
Many have said that "Beauty is in the eye of the beholder". And so it is with animation as well. Perhaps there should be a user selectable control which allows THE USER to select animation of not and is merely defaulted to whatever the developer , or specifications, dictate. ~ imho ~