As of December 1, 2020, Focal Point is retired and repurposed as a reference repository. We value the wealth of knowledge that's been shared here over the years. You'll continue to have access to this treasure trove of knowledge, for search purposes only.
Join the TIBCO Community TIBCO Community is a collaborative space for users to share knowledge and support one another in making the best use of TIBCO products and services. There are several TIBCO WebFOCUS resources in the community.
From the Home page, select Predict: WebFOCUS to view articles, questions, and trending articles.
Select Products from the top navigation bar, scroll, and then select the TIBCO WebFOCUS product page to view product overview, articles, and discussions.
Request access to the private WebFOCUS User Group (login required) to network with fellow members.
Former myibi community members should have received an email on 8/3/22 to activate their user accounts to join the community. Check your Spam folder for the email. Please get in touch with us at community@tibco.com for further assistance. Reference the community FAQ to learn more about the community.
I'm running a failry simple FEX in which I'm extracting several data fields which are alphanumeric, however, I have just received the following error message and am not sure how to resolve it:
(FOC200) INTERRUPT. DATA EXCEPTION (FOC1024) INVALID OCCURS FIELD VALUE : AD020SG
The fields in question are basically fields for City, State and Zip Code, coming out of a VSAM file. If anyone has a suggestion or two about how to work on this, I would be most appreciative. Thanks in advance!This message has been edited. Last edited by: Kerry,
Have you verified your master against the VSAM file, i.e. COBOL FD,to make sure that the total length is ok via a CHECK FILE?
Oftentimes, you will get errors because the master doesn't describe the data exactly and you get off column and your fex doesn't blow up until it gets to a field that it views as having invalid data, like a bad sign for a packed field.
So the first thing I would do would be to compare the COBOL definition against the master. Remember it is the actuals that you are looking at.
The next thing is to print a few selected columns before and after what you think the problem area is. You can use READLIMIT to start with and increase it with each succeeding test.
I am already in the process of finding where the problem appears to be - it looks like it might be one of the segments of the MFD in question. There have been several files where I work that have been changed slightly, and it be this is one that was, but I wasn't informed. I'll address it from this perspective and see what I can figure out.