As of December 1, 2020, Focal Point is retired and repurposed as a reference repository. We value the wealth of knowledge that's been shared here over the years. You'll continue to have access to this treasure trove of knowledge, for search purposes only.
Join the TIBCO Community TIBCO Community is a collaborative space for users to share knowledge and support one another in making the best use of TIBCO products and services. There are several TIBCO WebFOCUS resources in the community.
From the Home page, select Predict: WebFOCUS to view articles, questions, and trending articles.
Select Products from the top navigation bar, scroll, and then select the TIBCO WebFOCUS product page to view product overview, articles, and discussions.
Request access to the private WebFOCUS User Group (login required) to network with fellow members.
Former myibi community members should have received an email on 8/3/22 to activate their user accounts to join the community. Check your Spam folder for the email. Please get in touch with us at community@tibco.com for further assistance. Reference the community FAQ to learn more about the community.
Hi all, I have a quick question which I will post . If I am creating a hold file on the server as in “APP HOLD ADVANCEMENT” and choose to hold as an unstyled format, lests say say FOCUS is that my most efficient format ? I know I can index with FOCUS but I sees the creation of an XML file in the OTHER folder at the same time. I am looking at efficiency for both size of the file created and more importantly for best response time reading that data. We would like to create some datamarts as we lack a data warehouse at this time and this would be a critical decisionThis message has been edited. Last edited by: Kerry,
If you're looking for efficiency at dealing with data sitting 'outside' of a database, I would look into FOCUS or even better, XFOCUS.
Now, this really depends on how you'll be accessing the data in that file. If it's random access (by key), then you must have an index and definitely FOCUS/XFOCUS is the way to go.
But if you'll read in sequential access from top to bottom, I don't know if FOCUS/XFOCUS will be significantly more efficient that a good old fix-length ALPHA hold file.
You'll obviously have to try different approaches and time your results to see which one behaves better for what you actually need.
You also need to keep, in mind that if you are joining to one of these files, you will need an index, otherwise you will have to cater for a nonindexed file.
Also, if space and load time is not that much of an issue, then index all columns and get yourself a Cube.....