As of December 1, 2020, Focal Point is retired and repurposed as a reference repository. We value the wealth of knowledge that's been shared here over the years. You'll continue to have access to this treasure trove of knowledge, for search purposes only.
Join the TIBCO Community TIBCO Community is a collaborative space for users to share knowledge and support one another in making the best use of TIBCO products and services. There are several TIBCO WebFOCUS resources in the community.
From the Home page, select Predict: WebFOCUS to view articles, questions, and trending articles.
Select Products from the top navigation bar, scroll, and then select the TIBCO WebFOCUS product page to view product overview, articles, and discussions.
Request access to the private WebFOCUS User Group (login required) to network with fellow members.
Former myibi community members should have received an email on 8/3/22 to activate their user accounts to join the community. Check your Spam folder for the email. Please get in touch with us at community@tibco.com for further assistance. Reference the community FAQ to learn more about the community.
Have tried searching and for the life of me I can't determine how to get the time at a nano-second level. Need this as we have a servlet which during a single session may be called multiple times within a minute with different inputs. Regular hold files appear to be fine of course, but we have a part of this that has to use -WRITE commands, and that file needs to be unique, to avoid conflicting processes writing to the same file.This message has been edited. Last edited by: Kerry,
Unfortunately, though you can get the Date-Time with nano seconds, the nano seconds are zero:
TABLE FILE CAR
PRINT
COUNTRY NOPRINT
COMPUTE CURRDTTM/HYYMDn = HGETC(12, 'HYYMDn');
WHERE RECORDLIMIT EQ 1
ON TABLE SET HOLDLIST PRINTONLY
ON TABLE HOLD AS H001 FORMAT ALPHA
END
-RUN
-READ H001 &CURRDTTM.A23.
-SET &CURRDTTM= EDIT(&CURRDTTM,'9999/99/99 99:99:99.99999999');
-TYPE &CURRDTTM
Francis
Give me code, or give me retirement. In FOCUS since 1991
Production: WF 7.7.05M, Dev Studio, BID, MRE, WebSphere, DB2 / Test: WF 8.1.05M, App Studio, BI Portal, Report Caster, jQuery, HighCharts, Apache Tomcat, MS SQL Server
Thanks for getting me on the right track, and Francis thanks for pointing out that nanos come back as 0. I can use microseconds along with a random number to virtually guarantee that I won't have a repeated "key" during the same timeframe.
Last time I experimented, it appeared that WF used current time to the *second* as the random-number-generator seed. If that is so, you'll gain nothing (in terms of uniqueness) from appending a "random" value to the ms-granular time
Posts: 1925 | Location: NYC | In FOCUS since 1983 | Registered: January 11, 2005