Focal Point Banner


As of December 1, 2020, Focal Point is retired and repurposed as a reference repository. We value the wealth of knowledge that's been shared here over the years. You'll continue to have access to this treasure trove of knowledge, for search purposes only.

Join the TIBCO Community
TIBCO Community is a collaborative space for users to share knowledge and support one another in making the best use of TIBCO products and services. There are several TIBCO WebFOCUS resources in the community.

  • From the Home page, select Predict: WebFOCUS to view articles, questions, and trending articles.
  • Select Products from the top navigation bar, scroll, and then select the TIBCO WebFOCUS product page to view product overview, articles, and discussions.
  • Request access to the private WebFOCUS User Group (login required) to network with fellow members.

Former myibi community members should have received an email on 8/3/22 to activate their user accounts to join the community. Check your Spam folder for the email. Please get in touch with us at community@tibco.com for further assistance. Reference the community FAQ to learn more about the community.


Focal Point    Focal Point Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  WebFOCUS/FOCUS Forum on Focal Point     [CLOSED]Which will take less time : A computed column or direct database column?

Read-Only Read-Only Topic
Go
Search
Notify
Tools
[CLOSED]Which will take less time : A computed column or direct database column?
 Login/Join
 
Member
posted
Hi,

There is a scenario that I have to used a database column on the report, whereas it can be computed in .fex code too by using other database columns.
Here is my question arise:
Which will take less time : A computed column or direct database column? and Why?

Please suggests me.


Regards,
Sandy Sagar

This message has been edited. Last edited by: <Emily McAllister>,


WebFOCUS 7.6
Windows, All Outputs
 
Posts: 25 | Registered: September 15, 2014Report This Post
Expert
posted Hide Post
I would think DB column, not knowing all the details of the calc.

You are just pulling the data.


Waz...

Prod:WebFOCUS 7.6.10/8.1.04Upgrade:WebFOCUS 8.2.07OS:LinuxOutputs:HTML, PDF, Excel, PPT
In Focus since 1984
Pity the lost knowledge of an old programmer!

 
Posts: 6347 | Location: 33°49'23.0"S, 151°11'41.0"E | Registered: October 31, 2006Report This Post
Silver Member
posted Hide Post
I would propose that if the column is on a table you would otherwise not read then the extra i-o would take longer than a calculation against data you are already getting in your data block. But this would so much depend on whether extra disk access would be required versus data in memory. If this is time critical I would suggest trying both and getting some stats out of the box. (I've had this in oltp systems where the server is performing thousands of tps against stringent performance criteria - then disk access can be a significant performance issue)


7.7.05 Windows.
 
Posts: 39 | Location: UK | Registered: July 11, 2012Report This Post
  Powered by Social Strata  

Read-Only Read-Only Topic

Focal Point    Focal Point Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  WebFOCUS/FOCUS Forum on Focal Point     [CLOSED]Which will take less time : A computed column or direct database column?

Copyright © 1996-2020 Information Builders