As of December 1, 2020, Focal Point is retired and repurposed as a reference repository. We value the wealth of knowledge that's been shared here over the years. You'll continue to have access to this treasure trove of knowledge, for search purposes only.
Join the TIBCO Community TIBCO Community is a collaborative space for users to share knowledge and support one another in making the best use of TIBCO products and services. There are several TIBCO WebFOCUS resources in the community.
From the Home page, select Predict: WebFOCUS to view articles, questions, and trending articles.
Select Products from the top navigation bar, scroll, and then select the TIBCO WebFOCUS product page to view product overview, articles, and discussions.
Request access to the private WebFOCUS User Group (login required) to network with fellow members.
Former myibi community members should have received an email on 8/3/22 to activate their user accounts to join the community. Check your Spam folder for the email. Please get in touch with us at community@tibco.com for further assistance. Reference the community FAQ to learn more about the community.
I'm working on a report where rather similar data from two different data sources needs to be compared, namely a list of master filenames and fields on our WF server compared to a list of the same on our WF client. Some fields are only relevant on the server (such as database names and schema names), while other fields are only relevant on the client (such as the EDA connection used).
So I have two sets of fields with often the same field names, from different sources, that I want to combine into one data source.
I think MATCH FILE is the most appropriate tool to merge these, but because almost all field names are the same between the two data sources I need some way to distinguish them from each other in the result. I was already prefixing almost every field name to that effect, but then it struck me:
Wouldn't it be infinitely convenient to be able to write those identically named unmatched fields into separate segments?
Is that possible at the moment? If so, how to do that? If not, wouldn't that be a good feature to have?
As an example of what I'm dealing with, I currently have this code:
MATCH
FILE MASTERS_remote
PRINT
APPNAME AS RAPPNAME
MASTERFILE AS RMASTERFILE
MASTERCREATDT AS RMASTERCREATDT
PHNAME AS RPHNAME
CREATDATE AS TBLCREATEDATE
CATTIME AS TBLCREATETIME
RECLENGTH AS TBLRECLENGTH
TBTYPE
SCHEMANAME
TABLENAME
REALNAME
KEYCOLUMNS AS RKEYCOLUMNS
COLTYPE AS RCOLTYPE
LENGTH AS RLENGTH
SCALE AS RSCALE
NULLS AS RNULLS
REMARKS AS RREMARKS
TITLE AS RTITLE
LABEL AS RLABEL
ALIAS AS RALIAS
HELPMESSAGE AS RHELPMESSAGE
LONGDESC AS RLONGDESC
REMARKS AS RREMARKS
USAGE AS RUSAGE
ACTUAL AS RACTUAL
SKEYS AS RSKEYS
KEYSEQ AS RKEYSEQ
DEFINE AS RDEFINE
BY MASTERNAME
BY SEGNAME
BY COLNO
BY FIELDNAME
RUN
FILE MASTERS_local
PRINT
APPNAME AS LAPPNAME
MASTERFILE AS LMASTERFILE
MASTERCREATDT AS LMASTERCREATDT
PHNAME AS LPHNAME
SERVER
KEYCOLUMNS AS LKEYCOLUMNS
COLTYPE AS LCOLTYPE
LENGTH AS LLENGTH
SCALE AS LSCALE
NULLS AS LNULLS
REMARKS AS LREMARKS
TITLE AS LTITLE
LABEL AS LLABEL
ALIAS AS LALIAS
HELPMESSAGE AS LHELPMESSAGE
LONGDESC AS LLONGDESC
REMARKS AS LREMARKS
USAGE AS LUSAGE
ACTUAL AS LACTUAL
SKEYS AS LSKEYS
KEYSEQ AS LKEYSEQ
DEFINE AS LDEFINE
BY MASTERNAME
BY SEGNAME
BY COLNO
BY FIELDNAME
AFTER MATCH HOLD OLD-OR-NEW
END
-RUN
As you can see, having to prefix all those fields is a bit of a chore...This message has been edited. Last edited by: Kerry,
WebFOCUS 8.1.03, Windows 7-64/2008-64, IBM DB2/400, Oracle 11g & RDB, MS SQL-Server 2005, SAP, PostgreSQL 11, Output: HTML, PDF, Excel 2010 : Member of User Group Benelux :
From our technicals: Please open a case with Customer Support Services for assistance. The phone number is 1-800-736-6130, or access online at InfoResponse.
Cheers,
Kerry
Kerry Zhan Focal Point Moderator Information Builders, Inc.
Posts: 1948 | Location: New York | Registered: November 16, 2004