Focal Point Banner


As of December 1, 2020, Focal Point is retired and repurposed as a reference repository. We value the wealth of knowledge that's been shared here over the years. You'll continue to have access to this treasure trove of knowledge, for search purposes only.

Join the TIBCO Community
TIBCO Community is a collaborative space for users to share knowledge and support one another in making the best use of TIBCO products and services. There are several TIBCO WebFOCUS resources in the community.

  • From the Home page, select Predict: WebFOCUS to view articles, questions, and trending articles.
  • Select Products from the top navigation bar, scroll, and then select the TIBCO WebFOCUS product page to view product overview, articles, and discussions.
  • Request access to the private WebFOCUS User Group (login required) to network with fellow members.

Former myibi community members should have received an email on 8/3/22 to activate their user accounts to join the community. Check your Spam folder for the email. Please get in touch with us at community@tibco.com for further assistance. Reference the community FAQ to learn more about the community.


Focal Point    Focal Point Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  WebFOCUS/FOCUS Forum on Focal Point     Is anyone using Alpha Variable fields?

Read-Only Read-Only Topic
Go
Search
Notify
Tools
Is anyone using Alpha Variable fields?
 Login/Join
 
Member
posted
Webfocus seems to have many problems dealing with Alpha Variable fields rather then fixed length. Within our environment, we have many different data sources primarily coming from Oracle.
We are a large company and not the same groups do not manage all tables so the key fields we join on are defined in different ways (i.e. A10V, A15, A20, etc.) across the different Oracle tables.
Within WF you can't seem to join 2 Alpha fixed fields together that are not the exact same definition, but you can do this with Alpha Variable.
In addition, using fixed length within Oracle takes up more room.

We are finding many different problems when we go to create jobs and the answer always seems to be changing it to fixed length.

Does anyone else have issues with Variable length fields?
 
Posts: 3 | Registered: September 17, 2008Report This Post
Master
posted Hide Post
Kathy

wf came late to variable length fields and I would suggest you do everything as fixed (we also Oracle shop). The prob with joins is resolved with a setting ORACHAR=VAR.

Here are ours

(FOC1496) AUTODISCONNECT OPTION IS - : ON FIN
(FOC1499) AUTOCOMMIT OPTION IS - : ON COMMAND
(FOC1491) FETCH BUFFERING FACTOR - : 5000
(FOC1531) INSERT BUFFERING FACTOR - : 500
(FOC1652) CHARACTER TYPE FOR INSERT OR UPDATE - : VAR
(FOC1653) CONVERSION STYLE FOR ORACLE NUMBERS - : COMPAT
(FOC1654) ORACLE HOME - : Not set
(FOC1655) ORACLE SID - : Not set
(FOC1441) WRITE FUNCTIONALITY IS - : ON
(FOC1445) OPTIMIZATION OPTION IS - : ON
(FOC1763) IF-THEN-ELSE OPTIMIZATION IS - : ON
(FOC1484) SQL ERROR MESSAGE TYPE IS - : DBMS
(FOC1552) INTERFACE DEFAULT DATE TYPE - : NEW
(FOC1446) DEFAULT DBSPACE IS - :

Also there is a setting to stop AnVs being gened for Oracle varchars in the metadata. NB dont change Oracle just use fixed length in your metadata.

Do a search of the forum on ORACHAR as well...

This message has been edited. Last edited by: hammo1j,



Server: WF 7.6.2 ( BID/Rcaster) Platform: W2003Server/IIS6/Tomcat/SQL Server repository Adapters: SQL Server 2000/Oracle 9.2
Desktop: Dev Studio 765/XP/Office 2003 Applications: IFS/Jobscope/Maximo
 
Posts: 888 | Location: Airstrip One | Registered: October 06, 2006Report This Post
Virtuoso
posted Hide Post
Direct answer to Kathy's question - boy, do I have issues! Insomuch that we avoid them altogether. And seems you've already found the solution.

SET VARCHAR=OFF in the server profile would probably resolve most issues. You would need to regenerate your master files after changing the setting.


Regards,

Darin



In FOCUS since 1991
WF Server: 7.7.04 on Linux and Z/OS, ReportCaster, Self-Service, MRE, Java, Flex
Data: DB2/UDB, Adabas, SQL Server Output: HTML,PDF,EXL2K/07, PS, AHTML, Flex
WF Client: 77 on Linux w/Tomcat
 
Posts: 2298 | Location: Salt Lake City, Utah | Registered: February 02, 2007Report This Post
Master
posted Hide Post
If you use the VARCHAR=OFF option, you may need to create your masters rather than regenerating them.


Pat
WF 7.6.8, AIX, AS400, NT
AS400 FOCUS, AIX FOCUS,
Oracle, DB2, JDE, Lotus Notes
 
Posts: 755 | Location: TX | Registered: September 25, 2007Report This Post
Expert
posted Hide Post
SQL SQLORA SET VARCHAR OFF
is in my edasprof
then i re-create my masters using the synonmym creator.
As PB says, 'refresh' isn't quite enough.
Refresh will only take the V off the ACTUAL, not the USAGE.
So you have to CREATE NEW and click the 'OVERWRITE' box..you don't have to delete them and recreate them, which is nice.
Then you'll have the V off both the ACUAL and the USAGE.
I'm with Darin... Its a real good thing to do. it avoids all kinds of ageda !




In Focus since 1979///7706m/5 ;wintel 2008/64;OAM security; Oracle db, ///MRE/BID
 
Posts: 3811 | Location: Manhattan | Registered: October 28, 2003Report This Post
Expert
posted Hide Post
... but watch out for loss of customisations such as TITLE and DESCRIPTION keywords - depending upon the release that you are on these may get "lost" - later releases are better.

T



In FOCUS
since 1986
WebFOCUS Server 8.2.01M, thru 8.2.07 on Windows Svr 2008 R2  
WebFOCUS App Studio 8.2.06 standalone on Windows 10 
 
Posts: 5694 | Location: United Kingdom | Registered: April 08, 2004Report This Post
  Powered by Social Strata  

Read-Only Read-Only Topic

Focal Point    Focal Point Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  WebFOCUS/FOCUS Forum on Focal Point     Is anyone using Alpha Variable fields?

Copyright © 1996-2020 Information Builders