As of December 1, 2020, Focal Point is retired and repurposed as a reference repository. We value the wealth of knowledge that's been shared here over the years. You'll continue to have access to this treasure trove of knowledge, for search purposes only.
Join the TIBCO Community TIBCO Community is a collaborative space for users to share knowledge and support one another in making the best use of TIBCO products and services. There are several TIBCO WebFOCUS resources in the community.
From the Home page, select Predict: WebFOCUS to view articles, questions, and trending articles.
Select Products from the top navigation bar, scroll, and then select the TIBCO WebFOCUS product page to view product overview, articles, and discussions.
Request access to the private WebFOCUS User Group (login required) to network with fellow members.
Former myibi community members should have received an email on 8/3/22 to activate their user accounts to join the community. Check your Spam folder for the email. Please get in touch with us at community@tibco.com for further assistance. Reference the community FAQ to learn more about the community.
I think there's a limit of 6 files at one time! However, once you have 6 files from a match in a hold file you can then match that hold file to 5 more files.
However, Matches are not very efficient. You should try to join a few files at a time to produce hold files and keep working from there.
Good Luck! Carol
Posts: 428 | Location: Springfield, MA | Registered: May 07, 2003
Thanks guys, Actually, I used the function -Across column in terms of no of columns and verb objects. It worked fine when the FIELD is UP to 94, But I do need the FIELD Up to 100. I am getting an error (Topic: Limitation of Across, posted at 08 December, 2004 21:51)
(FOC153) VERB OBJECTS TIMES RETRIEVED COLUMNS EXCEEDS MAXIMUM
TABLE FILE EXAMPLE SUM FIELD1 OVER FIELD2 OVER FIELD3 OVER FIELD4 OVER FIELD5 OVER FIELD6 OVER FIELD7 OVER FIELD8 OVER ... FIELD98 OVER FIELD99 OVER FIELD100 BY FIELDX NOPRINT BY FIELDY NOPRINT BY FIELDZ NOPRINT ACROSS FIELDA AS '' COLUMNS 'JAN' AND 'FEB' AND 'MAR' AND 'APR' AND 'MAY' AND 'JUN' AND 'JUL' AND 'AUG' AND 'SEP' AND 'OCT' AND 'NOV' AND 'DEC' END
Other members suggest that it needs to seperate them into the table format as below. Then, Use the MATCH FILE function to match FIELD1 ..... FIELD100. Crazy
ANY SUGGESTION, PLEASE !
TABLE FILE FIELD1 PRINT JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC BY FIELDX BY FIELDY BY FIELDZ END This message has been edited. Last edited by: <Mabel>,
This sounds like a perfect FML application. However, if you dont want to use FML, then do 1 across with 12 months (use smart dates and you won't have to manually order the columns) and make each one of your concepts (the 'over' fields) a separate file which you concat when you read with a MORE command. Order them, in the order you want in your report. Use an integer field with an incrementing value for each of the separate files. Use a single variable in each of the files to contain the concept name as you would want it printed in your final report. Use a loop thru a list of concept names when you create the 100+ individual temp files, Use the same loop construct when you read them using MORE Then your final report is TABLE FILE FILE1 SUM thing ACROSS MONTH BY ORDER NOPRINT BY CONCEPT MORE FILE1 MORE FILE3 -etc This is all quite easy. But your post is titled 'match' and this problem has nothing to do with 'match'.
Posts: 3811 | Location: Manhattan | Registered: October 28, 2003