Focal Point Banner


As of December 1, 2020, Focal Point is retired and repurposed as a reference repository. We value the wealth of knowledge that's been shared here over the years. You'll continue to have access to this treasure trove of knowledge, for search purposes only.

Join the TIBCO Community
TIBCO Community is a collaborative space for users to share knowledge and support one another in making the best use of TIBCO products and services. There are several TIBCO WebFOCUS resources in the community.

  • From the Home page, select Predict: WebFOCUS to view articles, questions, and trending articles.
  • Select Products from the top navigation bar, scroll, and then select the TIBCO WebFOCUS product page to view product overview, articles, and discussions.
  • Request access to the private WebFOCUS User Group (login required) to network with fellow members.

Former myibi community members should have received an email on 8/3/22 to activate their user accounts to join the community. Check your Spam folder for the email. Please get in touch with us at community@tibco.com for further assistance. Reference the community FAQ to learn more about the community.


Focal Point    Focal Point Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  WebFOCUS/FOCUS Forum on Focal Point     [SOLVED] Resource Analyzer

Read-Only Read-Only Topic
Go
Search
Notify
Tools
[SOLVED] Resource Analyzer
 Login/Join
 
Francis Mariani
Expert
posted
Does turning Resource Analyzer on add to overhead?

This message has been edited. Last edited by: Kerry,


Francis


Give me code, or give me retirement. In FOCUS since 1991

Production: WF 7.7.05M, Dev Studio, BID, MRE, WebSphere, DB2 / Test: WF 8.1.05M, App Studio, BI Portal, Report Caster, jQuery, HighCharts, Apache Tomcat, MS SQL Server
 
Posts: 10577 | Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada | Registered: April 27, 2005Report This Post
Prarie
Virtuoso
posted Hide Post
From my admin
Yes, but how much depends on what collection type you use. We are currently using Query and Froms and are not monitoring data sources without Resource Governor. The overhead is very light and we collect enough information to keep management happy. We are currently using FOCUS repositories but will convert to XFOCUS in the near future.


In Focus since 1993. WebFOCUS 7.7.03 Win 2003
 
Posts: 1903 | Location: San Antonio | Registered: February 28, 2005Report This Post
hammo1j
Master
posted Hide Post
Yes if the overhead you are talking about is your cash because it needs a separate licence key!

Joking aside I would probably guess you will pay a very small performance hit for better statistics which will enable you to improve performance.


Server: WF 7.6.2 ( BID/Rcaster) Platform: W2003Server/IIS6/Tomcat/SQL Server repository Adapters: SQL Server 2000/Oracle 9.2
Desktop: Dev Studio 765/XP/Office 2003 Applications: IFS/Jobscope/Maximo
 
Posts: 888 | Location: Airstrip One | Registered: October 06, 2006Report This Post
Francis Mariani
Expert
posted Hide Post
Thanks guys.


Francis


Give me code, or give me retirement. In FOCUS since 1991

Production: WF 7.7.05M, Dev Studio, BID, MRE, WebSphere, DB2 / Test: WF 8.1.05M, App Studio, BI Portal, Report Caster, jQuery, HighCharts, Apache Tomcat, MS SQL Server
 
Posts: 10577 | Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada | Registered: April 27, 2005Report This Post
Håkan
Guru
posted Hide Post
Prarie,

have you completed your conversion to XFOCUS for RM? If so, does it work?

Rgds
Håkan

quote:
Originally posted by Prarie:
From my admin
Yes, but how much depends on what collection type you use. We are currently using Query and Froms and are not monitoring data sources without Resource Governor. The overhead is very light and we collect enough information to keep management happy. We are currently using FOCUS repositories but will convert to XFOCUS in the near future.


WebFOCUS DS 8.0.06/08 DS/AS
WebFOCUS RS 8.0.08 (Linux/IBM i)
WebFOCUS Client 8.0.06 (Linux)
 
Posts: 319 | Location: Stockholm, Sweden | Registered: February 04, 2004Report This Post
Prarie
Virtuoso
posted Hide Post
My Admin says there was problems with the Active Directories going to XFOCUS...So they remain FOCUS...but all the archives are XFOCUS.
 
Posts: 1903 | Location: San Antonio | Registered: February 28, 2005Report This Post
Prarie
Virtuoso
posted Hide Post
He gave me a better explanation

All archive files are XFOCUS files but the active collection is still FOCUS WebFOCUS 7.61 does not support XFOCUS for collecting data.

Reporting is done on XFOCUS monthly partitioned files with the current days information gathered from live FOCUS tables
 
Posts: 1903 | Location: San Antonio | Registered: February 28, 2005Report This Post
Håkan
Guru
posted Hide Post
Thanx Prarie,

do you know if that's solved in 7.6.4 or later releases?

Håkan


WebFOCUS DS 8.0.06/08 DS/AS
WebFOCUS RS 8.0.08 (Linux/IBM i)
WebFOCUS Client 8.0.06 (Linux)
 
Posts: 319 | Location: Stockholm, Sweden | Registered: February 04, 2004Report This Post
hammo1j
Master
posted Hide Post
Francis

I call this Resource Annihilator. We turned ours on and got some drop outs on caster jobs and have switched it off.

Gives good stats but be careful on the resource front esp with caster jobs.


Server: WF 7.6.2 ( BID/Rcaster) Platform: W2003Server/IIS6/Tomcat/SQL Server repository Adapters: SQL Server 2000/Oracle 9.2
Desktop: Dev Studio 765/XP/Office 2003 Applications: IFS/Jobscope/Maximo
 
Posts: 888 | Location: Airstrip One | Registered: October 06, 2006Report This Post
Prarie
Virtuoso
posted Hide Post
Supposed to be solved 7.6.5...but we have not addressed it again.
 
Posts: 1903 | Location: San Antonio | Registered: February 28, 2005Report This Post
  Powered by Social Strata  

Read-Only Read-Only Topic

Focal Point    Focal Point Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  WebFOCUS/FOCUS Forum on Focal Point     [SOLVED] Resource Analyzer

Copyright © 1996-2020 Information Builders