Does turning Resource Analyzer on add to overhead?This message has been edited. Last edited by: Kerry,
Francis
Give me code, or give me retirement. In FOCUS since 1991
Production: WF 7.7.05M, Dev Studio, BID, MRE, WebSphere, DB2 / Test: WF 8.1.05M, App Studio, BI Portal, Report Caster, jQuery, HighCharts, Apache Tomcat, MS SQL Server
October 03, 2007, 11:13 AM
Prarie
From my admin Yes, but how much depends on what collection type you use. We are currently using Query and Froms and are not monitoring data sources without Resource Governor. The overhead is very light and we collect enough information to keep management happy. We are currently using FOCUS repositories but will convert to XFOCUS in the near future.
In Focus since 1993. WebFOCUS 7.7.03 Win 2003
October 03, 2007, 11:14 AM
hammo1j
Yes if the overhead you are talking about is your cash because it needs a separate licence key!
Joking aside I would probably guess you will pay a very small performance hit for better statistics which will enable you to improve performance.
Server: WF 7.6.2 ( BID/Rcaster) Platform: W2003Server/IIS6/Tomcat/SQL Server repository Adapters: SQL Server 2000/Oracle 9.2 Desktop: Dev Studio 765/XP/Office 2003 Applications: IFS/Jobscope/Maximo
October 03, 2007, 11:22 AM
Francis Mariani
Thanks guys.
Francis
Give me code, or give me retirement. In FOCUS since 1991
Production: WF 7.7.05M, Dev Studio, BID, MRE, WebSphere, DB2 / Test: WF 8.1.05M, App Studio, BI Portal, Report Caster, jQuery, HighCharts, Apache Tomcat, MS SQL Server
November 06, 2008, 07:06 AM
Håkan
Prarie,
have you completed your conversion to XFOCUS for RM? If so, does it work?
Rgds Håkan
quote:
Originally posted by Prarie: From my admin Yes, but how much depends on what collection type you use. We are currently using Query and Froms and are not monitoring data sources without Resource Governor. The overhead is very light and we collect enough information to keep management happy. We are currently using FOCUS repositories but will convert to XFOCUS in the near future.
