As of December 1, 2020, Focal Point is retired and repurposed as a reference repository. We value the wealth of knowledge that's been shared here over the years. You'll continue to have access to this treasure trove of knowledge, for search purposes only.
Join the TIBCO Community TIBCO Community is a collaborative space for users to share knowledge and support one another in making the best use of TIBCO products and services. There are several TIBCO WebFOCUS resources in the community.
From the Home page, select Predict: WebFOCUS to view articles, questions, and trending articles.
Select Products from the top navigation bar, scroll, and then select the TIBCO WebFOCUS product page to view product overview, articles, and discussions.
Request access to the private WebFOCUS User Group (login required) to network with fellow members.
Former myibi community members should have received an email on 8/3/22 to activate their user accounts to join the community. Check your Spam folder for the email. Please get in touch with us at community@tibco.com for further assistance. Reference the community FAQ to learn more about the community.
today I was really suprised when I saw the following line of WF code from a collegue (WF 7.7.03 - still works in 7.7.05)
WHERE FIELD1 = &FILTER.QUOTEDSTRING;
I though, well this will never work. But actually - yes - it does work. While I could not find it anywhere in any document or this forum:
The assignment operator "=" can be used as a synonym for the relational op: "EQ". I knew about "IS" - but "=" - well it known e.g. as the relational comparison op in SQL, Pascal ... but in WebFOCUS?
I also tried it in DM - and well, it works, too.
-SET &TEST = IF 0 = 1 THEN 'YES' ELSE 'NO';
-TYPE &TEST
-* a.m. &TEST matches
-SET &TEST = IF 0 EQ 1 THEN 'YES' ELSE 'NO';
-TYPE &TEST
But, as you might guess, and we are working in WebFOCUS: all the other known ops like "<", ">", "<>", "<=", ">=" -> they do not work / are not symbolic for "LT" etc.
I do not say, that I prefer "EQ" to "=", but hey - if we are ongoingly talking about WebFOCUS and code-tightening - why introduce 2 symbols for the equality operator (and not for the other relational operators).
IMHO this is the complete opposite of a tightend reporting language.
Cheers LinneThis message has been edited. Last edited by: <Kathryn Henning>,
It may stop working in WF 8.0.25 or WF 8.3.01 HotFix 7 or any other interesting release in the future. Better to get rid of it now and stick to the standard and documented operators