As of December 1, 2020, Focal Point is retired and repurposed as a reference repository. We value the wealth of knowledge that's been shared here over the years. You'll continue to have access to this treasure trove of knowledge, for search purposes only.
Join the TIBCO Community TIBCO Community is a collaborative space for users to share knowledge and support one another in making the best use of TIBCO products and services. There are several TIBCO WebFOCUS resources in the community.
From the Home page, select Predict: WebFOCUS to view articles, questions, and trending articles.
Select Products from the top navigation bar, scroll, and then select the TIBCO WebFOCUS product page to view product overview, articles, and discussions.
Request access to the private WebFOCUS User Group (login required) to network with fellow members.
Former myibi community members should have received an email on 8/3/22 to activate their user accounts to join the community. Check your Spam folder for the email. Please get in touch with us at community@tibco.com for further assistance. Reference the community FAQ to learn more about the community.
When I monitor my jobs on the server console, right clicking and viewing statistics shows me the last master file that was accessed...except... when I am running a job hub-sub(?) using -REMOTE BEGIN/-REMOTE END.
In that case, I get a random master file name. I believe this is because the agent displays the last masterfile it was "aware" of, and since the fex is running on a different EDA server, it just displays the last master file name in memory.
Is that the case? Is there any way to clear the Last MasterFile Name from an agent - this has really led to some confusion in the past if we were looking at the correct job or not.
Thanks!
WebFOCUS 7.6.1 AIX / Windows 2003
Posts: 17 | Location: Milwaukee | Registered: February 16, 2006
It sounds like your thery is correct. I do not believe that you can clear it. If you really need to create a dummy master something like REMOTE and then query it and then issue the -REMOTE commands. just a suggestion