Focal Point Banner


As of December 1, 2020, Focal Point is retired and repurposed as a reference repository. We value the wealth of knowledge that's been shared here over the years. You'll continue to have access to this treasure trove of knowledge, for search purposes only.

Join the TIBCO Community
TIBCO Community is a collaborative space for users to share knowledge and support one another in making the best use of TIBCO products and services. There are several TIBCO WebFOCUS resources in the community.

  • From the Home page, select Predict: WebFOCUS to view articles, questions, and trending articles.
  • Select Products from the top navigation bar, scroll, and then select the TIBCO WebFOCUS product page to view product overview, articles, and discussions.
  • Request access to the private WebFOCUS User Group (login required) to network with fellow members.

Former myibi community members should have received an email on 8/3/22 to activate their user accounts to join the community. Check your Spam folder for the email. Please get in touch with us at community@tibco.com for further assistance. Reference the community FAQ to learn more about the community.


Focal Point    Focal Point Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  WebFOCUS/FOCUS Forum on Focal Point     [CLOSED] Leading digit in scientific notation

Read-Only Read-Only Topic
Go
Search
Notify
Tools
[CLOSED] Leading digit in scientific notation
 Login/Join
 
Member
posted
First time poster, long time lurker, somewhere between a novice and intermediate user. Thanks for all the tips!

I have a regular need to display values in scientific notation (i.e. 3.14E+00 to represent 3.14159...). WebFOCUS wants to "move" the decimal point one space to the left and place a leading zero in the value (i.e. 0.314E-01 to represent 3.14159...).

Is there a format specification or some type of "override" that will allow me to display these values in the commonly accepted manner?

TIA,
Jim

This message has been edited. Last edited by: Kerry,


WebFOCUS 7.1.6 on Sun/Solaris (dev/qual/prod), Servlet running on WebLogic 9.2
 
Posts: 17 | Registered: October 09, 2006Report This Post
Expert
posted Hide Post
Jim, sorry, I've never had to use scientific notation, but as this site (http://www.nyu.edu/pages/mathmol/textbook/scinot.html) clearly states,
quote:
The first number 1.23 is called the coefficient. It must be greater than or equal to 1 and less than 10.

The second number is called the base . It must always be 10 in scientific notation.

Exponents are often expressed using other notations. The number 123,000,000,000 can also be written as:

1.23E+11 or as 1.23 X 10^11

There's got to be a reason why WebFOCUS does not follow these scientific notation rules.

Perhaps a Scientist will answer.


Francis


Give me code, or give me retirement. In FOCUS since 1991

Production: WF 7.7.05M, Dev Studio, BID, MRE, WebSphere, DB2 / Test: WF 8.1.05M, App Studio, BI Portal, Report Caster, jQuery, HighCharts, Apache Tomcat, MS SQL Server
 
Posts: 10577 | Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada | Registered: April 27, 2005Report This Post
Expert
posted Hide Post
Jim,
put in an NFR right away.
i so second your motion.
the mantissa should be .141, not .314

This message has been edited. Last edited by: susannah,




In Focus since 1979///7706m/5 ;wintel 2008/64;OAM security; Oracle db, ///MRE/BID
 
Posts: 3811 | Location: Manhattan | Registered: October 28, 2003Report This Post
Expert
posted Hide Post
Susannah, don't tell me that not a single other client of IBI has tried using scientific notation and found it does not display correctly? Would an NFR been requested years ago?

Just a thought...


Francis


Give me code, or give me retirement. In FOCUS since 1991

Production: WF 7.7.05M, Dev Studio, BID, MRE, WebSphere, DB2 / Test: WF 8.1.05M, App Studio, BI Portal, Report Caster, jQuery, HighCharts, Apache Tomcat, MS SQL Server
 
Posts: 10577 | Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada | Registered: April 27, 2005Report This Post
Platinum Member
posted Hide Post
Hi Jim,
Check the support site. I do remember seeing this out there at one time. I think the function was EXPN.
Regards.
Rich


WebFOCUS 8202 Win 2012
Test - WebFOCUS 8203 on Win 2012
 
Posts: 173 | Registered: November 16, 2005Report This Post
Expert
posted Hide Post
The EXPN function "undoes" scientific notation.
quote:
You can use scientific notation to express 103 as:

1.03E+2Then

EXPN(1.03E+2)returns 103 as the result.


Francis


Give me code, or give me retirement. In FOCUS since 1991

Production: WF 7.7.05M, Dev Studio, BID, MRE, WebSphere, DB2 / Test: WF 8.1.05M, App Studio, BI Portal, Report Caster, jQuery, HighCharts, Apache Tomcat, MS SQL Server
 
Posts: 10577 | Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada | Registered: April 27, 2005Report This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Thanks to all for your suggestions. I'll be opening a case with Tech Support to address the problem.

-Jim


WebFOCUS 7.1.6 on Sun/Solaris (dev/qual/prod), Servlet running on WebLogic 9.2
 
Posts: 17 | Registered: October 09, 2006Report This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Has this issue ever been resolved or is there a known work around? I am experiencing the same issue using the scientific notation functionality.

Thanks!


WebFOCUS 7.6
Windows, All Outputs
 
Posts: 1 | Registered: May 24, 2011Report This Post
  Powered by Social Strata  

Read-Only Read-Only Topic

Focal Point    Focal Point Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  WebFOCUS/FOCUS Forum on Focal Point     [CLOSED] Leading digit in scientific notation

Copyright © 1996-2020 Information Builders