Focal Point Banner


As of December 1, 2020, Focal Point is retired and repurposed as a reference repository. We value the wealth of knowledge that's been shared here over the years. You'll continue to have access to this treasure trove of knowledge, for search purposes only.

Join the TIBCO Community
TIBCO Community is a collaborative space for users to share knowledge and support one another in making the best use of TIBCO products and services. There are several TIBCO WebFOCUS resources in the community.

  • From the Home page, select Predict: WebFOCUS to view articles, questions, and trending articles.
  • Select Products from the top navigation bar, scroll, and then select the TIBCO WebFOCUS product page to view product overview, articles, and discussions.
  • Request access to the private WebFOCUS User Group (login required) to network with fellow members.

Former myibi community members should have received an email on 8/3/22 to activate their user accounts to join the community. Check your Spam folder for the email. Please get in touch with us at community@tibco.com for further assistance. Reference the community FAQ to learn more about the community.


Focal Point    Focal Point Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  WebFOCUS/FOCUS Forum on Focal Point     [SOLVED]Performance degradation using MRE

Read-Only Read-Only Topic
Go
Search
Notify
Tools
[SOLVED]Performance degradation using MRE
 Login/Join
 
Guru
posted
We are calling a SQL Server stored procedure from within WebFOCUS. When both the HTML and Focexec were located in basedir/domain/app it took 5.16 minutes. Moving the Focexec to approot/app reduced the elapsed time to 2.14 minutes. When putting the HTML into approot/app I was able to cut 50% off execution time once again to 1.08 minutes. Besides, when the HTML did reside in basedir/domain/app, WebFOCUS spawned 2 agents, 2 sessions and 2 connections making those 2 processes compete in the SQL Server. Could anybody explain to me, what the idea behind this is? I find it very hard to believe it's a trick from IBI to defer people to use MRE.

We're on WF 7.6.10, Windows Server 2003, SQL Server 2005

The way I used to solve/work-around this was to:

1. Have the html item in the MRE tree redirect to a html page in the server area.
2. Move the .fex to an app in the server area.
3. Call the fex from the server html page.

This way I managed to cut execution time by 50% compared with an all MRE based solution.

Furthermore, WebFOCUS did not spawn 2 agents etc which seemed to create some kind of dead lock in SQL Server.

This message has been edited. Last edited by: Håkan,


WebFOCUS DS 8.0.06/08 DS/AS
WebFOCUS RS 8.0.08 (Linux/IBM i)
WebFOCUS Client 8.0.06 (Linux)
 
Posts: 319 | Location: Stockholm, Sweden | Registered: February 04, 2004Report This Post
Expert
posted Hide Post
Thanks Hakan for sharing the workaround with all.

Cheers,

Kerry


Kerry Zhan
Focal Point Moderator
Information Builders, Inc.
 
Posts: 1948 | Location: New York | Registered: November 16, 2004Report This Post
  Powered by Social Strata  

Read-Only Read-Only Topic

Focal Point    Focal Point Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  WebFOCUS/FOCUS Forum on Focal Point     [SOLVED]Performance degradation using MRE

Copyright © 1996-2020 Information Builders